Rather like a round of golf with this correspondent, Tiger Woods’s rehabilitation from the back surgery he had a month ago is going to be “tedious and long”.
The ailing former world No 1 made his last competitive outing at the Wyndham Championship at the end of August before making a surprise announcement a few weeks later that he had undergone surgery on his back for a second time.
Woods, who spent much of the early part of the 2015 season hirpling and hobbling about and withdrawing from tournaments, had his first surgery just before the Masters in 2014 and was out of action for three months. He did return but confessed that his comeback was too early. It now doesn’t look like we will be seeing Woods any time soon.
"Rehab will be soon, and it will be tedious and long," said Woods, who is recovering from the surgery to cure a fragmented disc that was pinching a nerve. "The last one, it took me a while to get back. Some players on tour have done the same procedure and to be back pain-free it took them over a year."
Woods, who has slithered to No 334 on the world rankings, will celebrate his 40th birthday this December but the 14-time major winner is still clinging to the hope that he can still have some roaring 40s. Despite his aches, pains and slide down the global order, Woods continues to talk in upbeat tones. We’ve heard it all before, of course. “It's important for me to have more than 18 majors when all is said and done," he said. "It took Jack (Nicklaus) his whole career to achieve it and mine is not done yet. I believe that I have a very good record for 20 years on the tour. The main thing is to get fit and to reach my 40s with good health to be as successful as Vijay (Singh), who won most of his tournaments at that age.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here