Two home defeats in the space of three days may not usually be seen as a sure sign of progress, but then again it all depends on the context of those results.
For Kallum Higginbotham and his Kilmarnock team-mates, the frustration of narrow defeats to Hearts and Hamilton last week are comforting signals of improvement to add to their victories over Dundee United and St Johnstone in their previous two games, particularly when compared to early-season shellackings at the hands of Dundee and Ross County.
He said: “If you were watching the performances over the last four weeks compared to the beginning of the season, you can see a massive improvement in how we’re playing,” he said.
“We should really be winning at home, especially when you go in 1-0 up at half-time, but we’ve not won today so we need to dust ourselves down and go again next week at Tynecastle.
“I wouldn’t say our confidence is fragile. I think our confidence has improved a lot over the last couple of weeks, but taking a defeat on Wednesday and losing again today is a blow.
“We know what kind of quality we’ve got in the dressing room, but we still need to be working hard because that’s where it starts. First and foremost you’ve got to match the opposition that you’re playing against with work-rate, especially Hamilton as that’s what they’re based on, and all credit to them, but we’re disappointed we’ve not come away with the three points.
“We’re at home, and I think we’ve had enough chances to win the game.
“No disrespect to Hamilton, they played well, but I would say we had the better of the chances on the day and on another day we go and win the game.
“It’s happened too many times this season already, and it’s still only early on in the season, so we need to pick it up.
“It shouldn’t take us to go behind to start playing again. When we were already 1-0 up we should have been confident enough to come out in the second-half and try to get that second goal.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here