Kevin Pietersen was thrilled to see England reclaim the Ashes this summer and accepts their performance went some way to vindicating his own exile.
Pietersen began the season with the door seemingly ajar for an unlikely recall to the Test set-up following conciliatory comments from new England and Wales Cricket Board chairman Colin Graves.
But when Pietersen's former captain Andrew Strauss was appointed as managing director, his first move was to rule out a comeback for the controversial 35-year-old.
It was a decision which did not go down well with Pietersen, or his many advocates.
But an impressive summer from the national side, including a 3-2 series win over Australia to bring home the urn, has taken the issue somewhat off the agenda.
And, speaking at the Sports Industry Breakfast Club, Pietersen said: "Absolutely it seems to be the right decision at the moment.
"I didn't find it hard [to watch] at all. I love seeing England win.
"I have some real close buddies in that side and seeing them do the business was something that made me happy. Seeing those guys play so well and just seeing the structure and the way it has developed makes me so happy."
With England now in his past, Pietersen's future is primarily in domestic Twenty20 competitions - with a contract at the Pakistan Super League his latest undertaking.
Despite that, he cannot hide his affinity for the longer form.
"Twenty20 cricket is here to stay, the game brings in a whole different audience to the sport, but I love Test cricket," he said.
"We owe it to the great game to speak positively about Test cricket. It's an amazing part of what we do and it's the thing I miss most about the game.
"The art of that first morning, that first half an hour of a Test match. That hour before end of play. It's all so fascinating. You don't get that in any other version."
"Test cricketers should get paid more, they need to know they are being looked after. With the lures of franchise cricket, we need to protect the game. Test matches should be the pinnacle.
"I would love to play Test cricket. If that can't happen then I will just keep plying my trade anywhere I can over the next few years."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here