Sir Alex Ferguson believes managers are not blooding enough young home-grown players because they live in fear of getting the sack.
The likes of David Beckham, Ryan Giggs, Paul Scholes and the Neville brothers graduated from the Manchester United youth set up and became first-team stars during Ferguson's spell in charge at Old Trafford.
But with so much money involved in top-flight football now, the Scot thinks managers are reluctant to gamble on academy products.
Ferguson told ITV News: "There needs to be a cultural change in our game to allow managers the time to breathe, to develop a system where the supporters are going 'Yeah, we've got five young kids for the first team, from the reserve or youth team, into the first team'.
"That would be great. Progress of the game. And it would benefit the English team."
Ferguson, speaking on the day his new book 'Leading' was published, seemed to agree with FA chairman Greg Dyke's claim that home-grown players were becoming an "endangered species".
"He has a point, there is no question about that, and I think we'd like to see more home-grown talent," Ferguson said.
"Give them the proper platform, proper drive, I think anything is possible."
In order to improve the state of the national game, Dyke is considering raising the quota of home-grown players in Premier League squads from eight to 12.
"I think nothing is wrong with that," Ferguson said.
"He's got the authority certainly to be listened to, there's no question of that.
"Getting the consensus from other clubs will be more difficult because there's a pressure on the managers to get the results, which means sometimes he tosses his beliefs out the window because he wants to keep his job."
During the interview with ITV, Ferguson also defended the huge salaries clubs pay to their players nowadays.
"I've no problem with what the top players get paid," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here