LEIGH Griffiths is set to land in hot water with the Scottish Football Association after claiming that referee Craig Thomson would have sent off any Celtic player guilty of the kind of infringement that saw Andrew Considine hand the Parkhead side a first-half penalty at Pittodrie.
Celtic took the lead when Griffiths converted from the spot, but second-half goals from Adam Rooney and Paul Quinn enabled Aberdeen to maintain their 100 per cent start to the season and move two points clear at the top of the Ladbrokes Premiership with a game in hand.
Griffiths, though, was irked that Considine escaped with only a booking after pulling him back in the area on 35 minutes. Aberdeen were reduced to 10 men in the latter stages of the game when Jonny Hayes was ordered off for a challenge on Mikael Lustig, but Griffiths felt they should have been forced to play with 10 men for the bulk of the encounter.
Asked if he was surprised that Considine was not dismissed, the Scotland striker said: “Very. I was going to score. I was about to whip it around the goalie. I was three or four yards away from goal, so he’s got to be sent off.
“If it’s up the other end, I’m positive, I’d put my mortgage on it, that Craig, the referee, sends one of our players off.
“What makes me say that? It’s what happens. If it’s up the other end, the Aberdeen players would have surrounded him and you can guarantee he sends him off. That’s 100 per cent.
“The ref said I was going away from goal, but, to me, I’m going to whip it round and put it to the goalie’s left-hand side. Look, it’s one of those things. We’ve been beaten and we need to look forward, but he grabbed hold of my shirt, I came back inside him and he birled me around.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel