Celtic have posted a financial loss of £3.6m for the previous financial year, a steep decline from the £11.8m profit the club celebrated this time a year ago.
The Parkhead side have attributed the shortfall to the fact they retained the services of Virgil Van Dijk last term - who has subsequently moved to Premiership side Southampton for £13m - in conjunction with the club's failure to secure UEFA Champions League football last season.
That failure has been replicated again this summer but the sale of Van Dijk is anticipated to offset any shortage again next term and chief executive Peter Lawwell was upbeat despite operating at a loss last season.
"We are stable, we are in a solid financial position, we have invested £10m in the playing squad over the last two transfer windows which is a massive amount in terms of the Scottish market and next season we expect to make a profit again.
"The sale of Virgil has guaranteed us £13m - and that is even if he never kicks a ball for Southampton. We would actually have preferred to keep him for at least another season but his wish was to go and we believe the deal we got was the best one available.
"Whatever money we bring in, we are always reinvesting in the playing squad.
"Obviously the lack of Champions League money will affect revenue streams but the sales for the Europa League at the minute are very encouraging. We have sold more than we did last year and we plan on making sure that the whole stadium will be open for all three of our home games.
Since 2010 Celtic have spent £40.5m on transfer fees and received £76m in from the sale of players: a £35.5m net profit on transfers.
It is a strategy that has been successful from a business perspective, although the criticism that comes from supporters of the club is that it leaves the manager having to rebuild a team every time a high profile club makes the move south of the border. Victor Wanyama, Gary Hooper, Fraser Forster and Van Dijk have all commanded significant fees but the challenge is always in sourcing their replacement at an affordable price.
In the current financial environment, however, Lawwell has maintained that there is no other viable alternative.
"What would another strategy be?," he asked. "There is no choice. And you have to place it in context. Last year we spent £9.42m on the playing staff and in the current climate that is something that I think we can look at as a strong investment in our squad.
"We want to keep developing young players and bringing in the best players we can but for us to sign a mature player who has no sell-on value, we would have to look at between £10m and £15m by the time you took account of salary demands and that isn't viable. The model we have is the only sustainable one there is."
Ibrox chairman Dave King claimed this week that Rangers would be pushing Celtic for the SPFL title next season, but Lawwell, inevitably, would not be drawn on the challenge that may be on the horizon from Govan. "I would have no comment at all to make on that," said Lawwell. "We have a huge game against Aberdeen this afternoon who have been our nearest rivals recently and we have a big game next week so that is where our focus is at the minute."
And the Celtic chief executive has also maintained that manager Ronny Deila retains the full support of the Celtic board.
"We have never made knee-jerk reactions," said Lawwell. "We believe that we can see the progress that is being made. We have a young, progressive manager and we believe that we can see the long-term picture for the club. "
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel