CRAIG CHALMERS, the former Scottish rugby international and British Lion whose son is soon to complete a two-year ban from rugby for doping, has criticised the Scottish Rugby Union for failing to take the opportunity to learn from the incident.
The 46 year-old also expressed his belief that doping in rugby is "rife".
In May 2013, while on duty with the Scotland Under 20s squad ahead of a Test with Ireland, Chalmers' son, Sam, tested positive for methandienone and stanozolol, both of which are listed as anabolic androgenic steroids on the list of prohibited substances by the World Anti-Doping Authority. Chalmers was just 19 at the time and admitted to taking a pill called Pro-SD in an attempt to bulk-up.
The implication of Sam's positive test was a two-year ban which comes to an end this month but his father has expressed his disappointment that the SRU did not take the opportunity to learn more from his son about doping in rugby and the reasons why players make the choice to dope.
Sam has done a considerable amount of work with the world governing body, the IRB, during his time out from the game, including appearing in an educational anti-doping video and talking to young players about his experience.
"Sam will come back from this episode more mature and a wiser person from it but he's done it all on his own," Chalmers says. "He's had no help from anyone other than support from family and friends. To be fair, Melrose have been pretty supportive but they can only do so much. The SRU have shown no support at all though - there's not been any kind of attempt to try to find out why Sam did it and that disappoints me a lot because he's young, he made a mistake and I think that if I was the head of a sport in a country and I'd seen what Sam had done, I'd be wanting to know why and what made him do it. Maybe it's nothing to do with them but . . ."
Chalmers, who coached Melrose after his playing career ended, also said that he believes his son is not the first player to have taken steroid pills either in an attempt to make physical gains or merely just to improve their appearance. "The thing with doping in rugby is that it goes on, I know it goes on," he says. "I hadn't really thought about it that much before Sam's case but then I began asking some people about the stuff that Sam had taken and they seemed to say that it was rife."
Chalmers claim that doping is prevalent in rugby is not unfounded. Of the 48 people currently on the UK Anti-Doping list of sanctioned individuals, 27 are from rugby- 18 of them coaches or athletes from rugby union. Last year, Ian Ritchie, the chief executive of England's governing body, the RFU, admitted that the sport had an issue with drugs that need to be urgently tackled. In addition to Ritchie's comments, the newly-appointed chief of UKAD, Nicole Sapstead, vowed recently to look at the worrying increase in teenage steroid use in sport and said that one of her prime objectives will be to focus on the increased use of steroids by aspiring athletes in rugby, as well as other sports.
"I suspect that many people take this steroid because they want the gains, whether it's to play sport- at any level- or it might just be to look good," Chalmers says. "So I think I'm much more aware now of what's happening and what's going on in the game. I've become a lot more aware of the issue because of Sam. As a coach, I never questioned if my players were doing anything illegal but there's always the worry there. Especially with these amateur players- these guys don't get paid, they're working all day and then they come training at night."
The solution, Chalmers believes, is two-fold. Prevention is better than cure, so they say, and this applies to anti-doping as well. Chalmers believes that players need to be better educated and informed about the issues around doping. "Clubs are good with having lists of banned substances but players don't read it," he says. "Unless you're in the [senior] national squad, then you get talks about different substances but Sam had never had any of these talks about what you can and can't take. It wasn't really spoken about because you just don't expect it to happen but everyone has to become more aware. The clubs, especially in the top league, need to be more aware."
In addition to enhancing the education and information provided to the players, Chalmers believes that the testing programme must also be improved. "A lot of the guys who are taking these drugs are playing for clubs in the lower leagues and they're never going to get tested," he says. "It's a huge problem, not just in Scotland but all over the UK and overseas too. I do believe that it is a problem in the sport and more needs to be done with testing."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article