It was grand slam day at the O2 yesterday.
The parade of champions comprised the 2014 winners of the Australian Open, Wimbledon and the US Open.
Senor Rafael Nadal, winner of the French Open this year and, frankly every year, is at home recovering from surgery.
The rest of the world is quietly recovering from the reality that Stanislas Wawrinka won in Melbourne and Marin Cilic triumphed at Flushing Meadows. Novak Djokovic's victory at Wimbledon was his seventh grand slam so was about as shocking as a politician reneging on a promise.
The trio gathered on the banks of the Thames with Tomas Berdych to make up the quorum. The lessons offered were delivered quickly in two periods each lasting just under an hour. It took Wawrinka 58 minutes to defeat Berdych 6-1, 6-1. Djokovic turned over Cilic 6-1, 6-1 in 56 minutes.
The most obvious conclusions to be drawn were that Wawrinka, if he could have less of a life outside tennis, may have more grand slams to win, that Berdych will have to console himself with tens of millions rather than one major, and that Cilic may consider New York 2015 as a singular lifetime achievement. The story, of course, is different for Djokovic. At 27, he is at his peak while his perennial rivals have either climbed the mountain or may be slipping down the other side. Nadal is battered, bruised and stitched. Andy Murray is stretching to make that major step again and Roger Federer, at 33, has not won a grand slam since 2012.
Djokovic, in contrast, has taken his winning streak indoors to 28 and his personal record against Cilic to 11-0, which is the sort of statistic that demands the intervention of social services.
If the matches passed in a time under the standard TV drama, there was just enough for the discerning spectator to enjoy. Wawrinka, when fit and motivated, has the ability and the sheer force to prevail in grand slams. At 29, he could be a regular contender at the sharp end, particularly in Melbourne and New York. Djokovic has that belief, that sublime technique, that sinuous movement that adds substance to his air of invincibility. Grand slam day at the O2 in 2015 may just involve the Serb. He is good enough to win all four and one suspects he knows it. And so do his opponents.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article