ALLY McCoist insists it is wrong to expect Rangers to win the SPFL Championship at a canter because their football budget is so vastly superior to anything else in the league.
The Ibrox manager, already trailing in Hearts' slipstream, is unapologetic in suggesting he would accept promotion through the play-offs.
But it seems clear that Ibrox fans do not believe that a squad and management team with such a comparatively vast wage bill is delivering anything like good value.
"If money was the answer to everything, Man City would win every game and every competition they're in," argued McCoist.
"The money's got nothing to do with me. I don't give players money for contracts. That's somebody else's gig.
"I can understand the argument, but look at the other side of the coin. If your budget is under 30 per cent of your turnover, it would be the envy of all the clubs in Europe.
"I never thought for a minute when we played any of the Italians, Milan or whatever, that I don't fancy us or said: 'Look at their wages and look at ours.' You don't do it."
McCoist insists he does not take the growing criticism personally, but he clearly harbours some frustration over the absence of any real middle ground in the appraisal of Rangers' recent performances.
"I just don't agree with (the view) it's either sh*** or sugar, if you'll excuse the expression," he remarked.
McCoist's training methods were slated earlier this week by former Hearts player Michael Stewart, but he remains confident in the worth of his toil within Murray Park.
"Nobody knows what goes on in here apart from the players, the staff and the management," responded McCoist. "We believe in our methods."
It is generally believed the 52-year-old will leave management completely when his time at Rangers is over and he has offered little to suggest otherwise.
"I've never really given it that much thought," he stated. "As a supporter, player, coach, and manager, this is the only club for me that exists anywhere, never mind just in this country."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article