A relieved but elated Andy Murray admitted he was fortunate to get through to the semi-finals of the French Open last night as he squeezed past Gael Monfils in another dramatic five-setter.
Having come through one epic encounter with Philipp Kohlschreiber - 12-10 in the final set - in the third round, Murray saw off Monfils 6-4, 6-1, 4-6, 1-6, 6-0 in a match every bit as up and down as the score suggests.
"I was just lucky in the end that he started the fifth set badly," said Murray, after equalling his best result at Roland Garros.
Murray and Monfils played a five-set match on Court Philippe Chatrier eight years ago, a match that the Frenchman won.
The Wimbledon champion was in total control after dominating the first two sets only for the Frenchman to galvanise the crowd by roaring back to force a decider.
But the Scot proved the stronger in the final set and came through to set up a semi-final against eight-times champion Rafael Nadal.
"It was really tricky conditions at the start, very windy," he said. "But I started well. Then when the wind calmed down he started playing so much better; he's such a great athlete, the best we have, and some of the shots he chased down were incredible. I was just lucky in the end."
Murray admitted he was glad to have closed out the match as darkness fell. "I didn't want to stop either. It was 20 past nine," he said. "I was told we had 20 minutes left so, you could potentially play two or three games in that time. Six was the maximum. I mean, it was so dark at the end."
As for facing Nadal, who recovered from a set down to beat fellow Spaniard David Ferrer in four sets, Murray acknowledged everything will need to fall his way if he is to make it to the final for the first time. "He's got some good memories on this court," Murray said, smiling. "But I'm very happy to be in the semi-finals and now I will have to make sure I recover well to be ready for that match."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article