Representatives from all sectors of the British skiing community have voted overwhelmingly for the removal from their posts of two of the sport's most senior officials, Konrad Bartelski and Paddy Mortimer.
Organisers characterised the mood as "angry and frustrated" at what they described as an unprecedented meeting organised hastily after Herald Sport revealed last weekend that Mortimer, head of performance at British Ski and Snowboard (BSS), had been forced to apologise after claiming Alpine racing world rankings were "blatantly rigged".
The public meeting was called by training provider Ambition Racing. Held in the northern Italian town of Bormio, it reportedly attracted about 80 people including representatives of clubs, academies, competing skiers and parents who are there for the English Championships, plus members of BSS, the sport's governing body, the chairman and CEO of Snowsport England and the chair of British Alpine Racing Ski Clubs.
Yet organisers said a vote of no confidence in Mortimer and Bartelski, who is chairman of the BSS Alpine, Speed and Telemark Committee, attracted no opposition, with 80% in favour, with 20% abstaining.
Malcolm Erskine, chairman of the British Ski Academy, initially called for the meeting because he believes the reputation of the sport has been damaged by claims about what equates to matchfixing in skiing having so far gone unpunished.
He said the strongest feeling was aroused by Finlay Mickel, the Scotland team coach who competed at the 2002 and 2006 Olympics.
Erskine said: "Mickel explained that while all the athletes knew the criteria required [for selection for Sochi] it was the fact they had been denied support to get those results that was the determining factor. He is sure that if TJ Baldwin and Dougie Crawford had been supported, the results would have come."
Erskine added that had Glasgow's Crawford made it to Sochi, he would have been among those wearing bibs numbers one to seven in the Olympic downhill in conditions where early starters had a significant advantage.
The message was reinforced by Ross Green, Mickel's fellow Olympian, who pointed out that on the current criteria he would not have qualified for Salt Lake City 12 years ago, when he finished 15th in the combined event .
Marc Telling of Ambition Racing told the meeting the policy being pursued by BSS was effectively a betrayal of the legacy of the London Olympics which had promised to inspire the next generation.
"Sending only two athletes to the Games is hardly inspiring for young people," he said. "Current racers have no faith in those running the sport."
Organisers claimed that another, more vaguely worded motion calling for change in the sport, received unanimous support from among those in attendance at the meeting.
Meanwhile, there was further confusion last night over the response to the situation of Snowsport Scotland (SSS) whose director, Gordon Ritchie, first raised the question of the BSS selection policy with Herald Sport.
Their chairman, Bill Aitken, issued a statement on their website on Friday claiming there were inaccuracies among Ritchie's comments. Asked to explain what they were, he could not and, after of pressure from within the Scottish skiing community, the statement was removed from the website the following day.
It had been understood a full meeting of member clubs would be held along with next week's scheduled SSS board meeting in Perth in order to clarify matters.
However, Jane Campbell Morrison, the SSS chief executive, said last night: "At present there has not been a request from any club to have a full meeting of the Snowsport Scotland member clubs next Monday as far as I am aware, therefore no invitation to a meeting has been sent out."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article