ABERDEEN were last night being hailed as the emergent force in Scottish football after they knocked holders Celtic out of the William Hill Scottish Cup.
With only a dwindling band of SPFL Premiership sides in today's quarter-final draw, a hard-earned 2-1 win at Parkhead has left the Pittodrie side - who are already in the League Cup final - favourites to lift the trophy.
Aberdeen reached both major finals under Ebbe Skovdahl in season 1999-2000 only to lose to Rangers in the Scottish Cup and Celtic in the League Cup.
However, defender Mark Reynolds believes the current group of players are made of different stuff to some of the teams of the past.
He said: "I think a lot of people were hoping this week would break our season, but we've come out the other side of it and shown there is a new Aberdeen, an up-and-coming team. The team that was here before would have started crumbling under that kind of pressure."
Celtic have suffered a series of disappointments in the cup competitions under Neil Lennon. They took an lead through Anthony Stokes yesterday but Aberdeen hit back through Russell Anderson and Perter Pawlett.
Lennon felt his side "played like strangers" at points during the match. The Parkhead manager said: "It is in the club's DNA, we're built to win trophies and this was another one I wanted to win.
"We showed [the players] footage of last year's cup final and how much it meant to everyone associated with the club, but it seems to have gone in one ear and out the other.
"Our passing, decision-making, defending, cohesion, partnerships within the team - we played like strangers at times. But we have to give credit to Aberdeen. They played with good energy, were very committed and looked the hungrier team at times. It will take a good side to beat them if they play like that."
l Final curtain, page seven
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article