The last man to lead the Lions to the holy grail of a series win in Australia has warned Warren Gatland's 2013 vintage that they will head to Sydney's ANZ Stadium as underdogs for Saturday's deciding Test.
Sir Ian McGeechan believes the Wallabies have regained the initiative following the hosts' come-from-behind one-point victory at Melbourne's Etihad Stadium yesterday.
"I have no doubt that Australian can [win the series next week]," the Scot said.
"The Lions know they have to improve and in Melbourne the Wallabies proved that if the right things are in place, then the momentum of it soon changes.
"Australia lost badly to France in the autumn last year but then they dogged out wins against England and Wales.
"Wallabies players have said they're staring down the biggest game of their careers in Sydney and that's what the Lions bring to the table.
"But it's also what the Lions have to understand. Their opponents see the third Test as the biggest game they've ever played outside a World Cup final and that's the challenge – you don't play opposition who have that mindset in every international game."
McGeechan, who captained Scotland nine times while winning his total of 32 caps, played in the Lions "invincibles" tour of South Africa in 1974.
"The trip changed me; playing next to and getting respect from great players like Gareth Edwards and JPR Williams gave me a different perception of what I, or indeed what any team, could achieve," McGeechan added.
As well as leading Wasps to Heineken Cup and Aviva Premiership titles, McGeechan coached the British & Irish Lions five times, leading the 1989 side to a 2-1 series win on Australian soil.
He is now hoping that history will repeat itself on Saturday in a match Australian supporters consider every bit as important as the 2003 World Cup final staged at the same venue.
"Probably psychologically, I think Australia would have got a lot out of beating the Lions in Melbourne by scoring the only try of the game," McGeechan said. "In the first Test match in Brisbane, the Lions would have been disappointed not to kick on and maintain control with the fresh props on. They definitely lost that control, so that is something they will have to work hard at putting right. Australia scrummaged well and their substitutions were far more effective in the game and that's another area the Lions can improve but it won't be easy.
"The Wallabies are comfortable at grinding out wins. In the third Bledisloe Test in Brisbane last year, they came back from a 22-0 loss in the second Test to draw 18-18. That takes some doing against a side like New Zealand. That is what the Lions have to respect, that Australia know how to find a way back, and generally do."
Despite awarding Australia his "favourites" tag for the third Test, McGeechan believes Warren Gatland's men have yet to play their best rugby.
Eighty minutes now stand between the Lions writing a new chapter in their glorious history, but McGeechan says they must not make the same unforced errors that have affected how the Tests thus far have panned out.
"The Lions will be a little bit disappointed with some aspects of their performances in the first two," he said.
"They have to be impressed with Australia's passing and running, and the speed, but I do think the Lions believe there is a type of rugby in there that they know, if they can produce it, will be very difficult to stop.
"They know that if they get their game right, it is going to be tough for Australia. But whoever wins, it's going to be very close in Sydney."
McGeechan believes the biggest advantage for the Lions is a fear of yet another series failure in Australia's back yard, having been just minutes away from winning the series in Melbourne.
"There was huge disappointment for the Lions in South Africa in 2009," he recalled. "We played great Test-match rugby but lost the second Test – and therefore the series – in an injury-time kick. We got it right in the third Test [the Lions beat the Springboks 28-9] but everyone remembers losing 28-25 in Pretoria.
"All of the 2013 coaching team bar one [Andy Farrell] were there in 2009 with me and they still remember it. That is driving them this time, that attitude of 'we're not going to let it happen again'."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article