Ricky Burns, the World Boxing Organisation lightweight champion from Coatbridge, insisted yesterday that his enforced absence from the ring will not have a negative impact on his attempt to make a successful mandatory defence against the Puerto Rican, Jose Gonzalez, in eight days' time.
Burns' promoter, Eddie Hearn was also keen to play down concerns that the shadow of a court case brought by his predecessor, Frank Warren, citing breach of contract, will not influence the outcome of the bout at Glasgow's Emirates Arena. There were certainly no outward signs that Burns is troubled by the threat of a six-figure lawsuit when he performed a public work-out at the city's St Enoch Centre.
Burns, inactive since September as because successive defences had to be called off, took time to say: "I'm not concerned about the postponements. I did two full training camps of 12 weeks before they fell through; I'm good to go."
Hearn, meanwhile, conceded that the prospect of impending court action is on Burns' mind after also accusing certain parties of deliberately "leaking" details of the action to members of the press in a deliberate attempt to disrupt the Scot's preparations.
"In his head, Ricky has no real concerns," said Hearn. "We know what has happened over the last few years and we're quite relaxed about it. It's a decision Ricky has had to take to further his career and he has a tremendous legal firm working for him.
"The £300,000 and all this sort of stuff, that's been put out there to serve a purpose; to disrupt Ricky, mentally, before this fight, in my opinion, and it's just another obstacle for him to overcome. But Ricky is mentally very strong and I don't think it's going to affect him, at all."
Meanwhile, Hearn confirmed that unification bouts with Adrien Broner, the World Boxing Council champion, and Miguel Vazquez, holder of the Internatioanal Boxing Federation belt, are live possibilities.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article