Scott Johnson has accused Wales of football-style simulation, claiming his team were "conned" at Murrayfield on Saturday, and called for the sport's administrators to address the scrummage problems that are blighting the sport.
Naming a team in which one Six Nations Championship newcomer was given his Test chance while another was discarded as Grant Gilchrist was called up for his debut and Rob Harley was dropped, he refused to accept that Scottish naivete had been at fault as Wales gained the upper hand in that key battleground, however.
"We were frustrated by the fact we got conned," he said, apparently referring to the way Wales were reckoned to have held back at scrums to give the impression Scotland were trying to engage too early.
"I don't want to be a coach that is sitting here telling players to start diving like soccer players. If we're not good enough then we're not good enough but I don't want to be chasing rainbows and trying to get us to cheat."
Johnson said he was in no way blaming the South African referee Craig Joubert and, for all that he expressed such contempt for the Welsh tactics, made it clear he believes that it is the law-makers who have to act.
"Every time we get a referee, we do due diligence. You would not believe how much they differ from one another," he asserted. "But the ref did not cost us the game, he's a good, decent man. The frustration lies in that we're not trying to con anyone.
"At the moment, people are trying to find ways to con them but we are not at the stage where we can con them. We are at the stage of saying we are being honest and let's see what we need to work on."
In terms of the impact on the sport, Johnson went so far as to hint that he would prefer to see England win the title on Saturday if the nation he once coached sticks to a similar approach.
"All I care is that the team that's trying to be positive wins," he said. "Positivity should be rewarded. If both sides are trying to be positive, I have no issue, but if it's a 50-50 call and people are playing ducks and drakes, give it to the side that's trying to do something."
He went on to express concern that his comments would be characterised as "a tirade" whereas his tone was reasoned as he reflected the concerns many have for the risk to the sport if the issues leading to so many failed scrummages are not addressed.
He is, however, expecting a more traditional challenge in the Stade de France this weekend, partly explaining why he has decided to give front-five forward Gilchrist a Test debut in the starting XV in such a potential cauldron rather than bring him in from the bench.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article