It is worryingly close to 40 years since I pitched up at Murrayfield for the first time.
The occasion in question was Scotland versus New Zealand, December 16, 1972. Sadly, my debut has been consistently overlooked by leading rugby historians who, for some mystifying reason, have tended to concentrate on the fact that Andy Irvine and Ian McGeechan were also making their first appearances in the national stadium that day.
As the presence of McGeechan and Irvine might indicate, Scotland had a decent enough team that day. The props, Ian Mighty Mouse McLauchlan and Sandy Carmichael, had snarled with the best of them on the Lions tour to New Zealand the previous year, and you wouldn't take a second row made up of gordon Brown and Al McHarg lightly either. Billy Steele and Jim Renwick buzzed about in the backline, and the team was led by the great, gallumphing figure that was Peter Brown.
And yet Scotland lost 14-9. On paper, it might look like a close match, but on the Murrayfield grass it was anything but. Even to a starry-eyed youth who had only a rudimentary knowledge of the game it was blindingly obvious that the All Blacks were a different race of men. They could have won the game by a street.
"Play was mainly confined to the Scottish half for the powerful and active New Zealand forwards dominated play in the loose," wrote Sandy Thorburn, for many years official historian to the Scottish Rugby Union. Thorburn was a devoted and assiduous chronicler of Scotland games, but he could have used that line many times in the 107-year history of this fixture. Come to think of it, a few of us were thinking about dragging it out again in the critical moments of this game.
Most of those were in the second quarter. The mantra from the Scottish players was that they had to make sure they were still in the game after 20 minutes, and with a 7-3 lead as that point loomed they had every reason to feel proud of themselves. What they seemed to forget, though, was that they had to stay in the game for the next 20 minutes as well. What actually happened then is that they were dynamited right out of it.
Dan Carter lit that fuse in what was arguably his best game in an All Black jersey since he destroyed the British and Irish Lions single-handedly in the second Test in Wellington in 2005. But while Dancing Dan was parading his genius, the rampaging New Zealand forwards did massive damage all around the pitch. They ran hard and with purpose deep into the Scottish 22, and they offloaded the ball with improbable dexterity.
Which is very much the All Blacks way. Since shaking off the monkey on the back that was their reputation as serial World Cup chokers, New Zealand have gone from strength to strength – and then some. When the young Jack Nicklaus burst on the golf scene half a century ago, the great Bobby Jones said that the prodigy "played a game with which I am not familiar." A few old rugby sages could probably say something similar of the 2012 All Blacks.
This was far from being their best performance of a stellar year, but their second-quarter display might just have been their best 20 minutes of rugby since they lodged the Webb Ellis trophy in that space in the trophy cabinet that had stayed embarrassingly empty for the previous two decades. They moved the ball sublimely, the wizardry of Carter ushering them along, and they demolished Scotland on the scoreboard. The Scots were guilty of falling off tackles and giving the All Blacks too much space, but if there is a side that could have lived with New Zealand in those minutes it is certainly not to be found on this planet.
"He was pretty handy with the ball and pretty handy with the boot," said New Zealand coach Steve Hansen, a man who is pretty handy at understatement. "The only thing he did wrong was give away an intercept try but that was a reflection of the way he was taking the ball to the line."
And the chances are that Carter will be causing a lot of problems for a good few years yet. The national hoodoo may have been banished on that mesmerising evening in Auckland just over a year ago, but Carter still carries one of his own. The fly-half was cruising towards his destiny in the 2011 World Cup, but it was snatched away when he collapsed in agony on a training pitch early in the tournament. Somehow, the All Blacks scraped over the finish line without him, but they would have won by a far greater distance if Carter had been in their side.
So 2015 looms before him. On Friday, Carter said dutiful things about only focusing on the next game, but he admitted that the World Cup is unfinished business for him. If all goes according to plan over the next three years, it is staggering to think what marks he could leave on the game. As things stand, he has 93 caps and 1381 Test points to his name, and he could raise those tallies to astronomical levels.
But then, the All Blacks are used to setting different standards. For as long as I've been watching this game, that's how things have worked. At the end of yesterday's match, a colleague turned to me and said: "Twenty minutes of madness," to explain Scotland's defeat.
"Forty years, mate," I replied. "Forty year and counting."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article