ROGER FEDERER of Switzerland beat David Ferrer of Spain yesterday.
This is the first in an occasional series of introductory sentences that will include: a politician fiddled his expenses yesterday, the sun rose today and a train will be late tomorrow.
In short – Senor Ferrer stands all of 5ft 9in in a tennis world that favours giants – the result of this Group B match in the Barclays ATP World Tour Finals was as obvious, with apologies to Raymond Chandler, as a tarantula on an angel cake.
For the record, Federer defeated the Spaniard 6-4, 7-6 (7-5) in one hour 48 minutes. In the Federer v Ferrer head to head, the only variables are the scene of the defeat and the time it takes the Greatest of All Time to win.
They have played 14 times and Federer has won on each occasion. Ferrer has been vanquished in Vienna, massacred in Miami, battered in Basle and hammered in Hamburg. If this was a boxing match, there would be no need for the referee to stop it as no sane authority would authorise it in the first place.
This record suggests Ferrer is a no-hoper, a serial loser. But only against Federer. The 30-year-old has won more matches (73) than anyone else on the ATP Tour this season. He has won more titles (seven) than anyone on the ATP tour this season. He is the world No.5. Yet, he is Federer's plaything.
The Little Beast is merely the Little Pest when playing the maestro who has won 17 grand slams and moved through to the knockout stages of the tournament with this inevitable victory.
Federer was asked if the 14-0 statistic was a distraction. "In some ways it's helpful to have that one-sided head-to-head record, but at the same time it sometimes creates pressure, as well," he said. "You always feel like this next match is probably going to happen. You try hard. He tries harder, too, because all he needs is that one win."
That win remained out of reach for Ferrer whose response was succinct. "He's the best of the history. He can do everything with his game," said the Spaniard. "You know, he has a lot of weapons for to do pain in my game." This was another statement of the obvious.
hugh macdonald
chief sportswriter
at o2 arena
hugh.macdonald@heraldandtimes.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article