Great Britain won their first men's Olympic team medal in a century last night when they claimed bronze in the North Greenwich arena, writes Henry McCall.
Louis Smith, Max Whitlock, Daniel Purvis, Sam Oldham and Kristian Thomas scored a total of 271.711 as they produced a prodigious team performance.
Britain had initially been awarded silver only for an inquiry into the score of Kohei Uchimura's pommel horse routine to allow Japan to claim silver with Britain then downgraded to bronze. China defended their gold medals.
The last time Britain was celebrating an Olympic team medal came during the Stockholm Games in 1912. Their reclassification as bronze winners following a Japanese appeal threatened to take the shine off their accomplishment, but a medal of any colour still exceeded all expectations for a British team seemingly dwarfed by the gymnastic talents of the United States, Russia, China and Japan. But the US faded in a tense finale and Team GB held off a challenge from Ukraine to secure their place on the podium.
Ukraine were in bronze medal position and Japan in silver with the final rotation to go, but brilliant performances on the floor by Whitlock, Purvis and Thomas enabled them to win a historic medal.
"We came into this competition not expecting anything," said Whitlock. "To be honest [the downgrading] doesn't matter. A bronze or silver medal doesn't matter. We've done more than we could have asked for."
Oldham, who was unable to train six months ago due to injury, was similarly thrilled. "I just can't believe it as we just walked away from a home Olympics with a bronze medal. It's unbelievable. We put in so much hard work and we're all so happy."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article