Hundreds of farmers are protesting in London due to proposed changes to inheritance tax.
A rally organised by the National Farmers' Union has accused Labour of a "stab in the back" over changes to tax exemptions announced in the latest budget.
Here's what you need to know.
What is happening?
Farmers from all four nations of the UK have travelled to London to protest against the current government.
NFU president Tom Bradshaw told members: “We know that the public are overwhelmingly supporting farmers, the second most trusted profession.”
Read More:
-
Scots among thousands of farmers descending on Westminster for protest
-
After Labour's farm inheritance tax raid, new trade deal could hammer Scots farmers
-
'Without food there is no wealth': Kevin McKenna at AgriScot 2024
What are the farmers protesting about?
The new Labour government has made changes to inheritance tax, removing a previous exemption for farmers.
Under agricultural property relief (APR), farmland could previously be passed down with no tax.
The rationale behind this is to ensure food security and that land is still being farmed, with many farmers not making much money.
However, from April 6, 2026 that exemption will only apply on land worth up to £1m.
After that farmers will pay a reduced rate of 20%, which can be paid interest free in instalments over 10 years.
Why have Labour done this?
The government believes the changes could raise up to £200m for services like the NHS, and that most farms would not be affected.
Environment secretary Steve Reed said on Tuesday: "Half of farmland sold last year went to non-farmers including wealthy individuals trying to avoid inheritance tax.
"It's right that tax changes will ensure everyone pays their fair share - and young farmers can realise their dream of buying their own farm."
Labour have previously said that only around 500 estates would be affected, but this is disputed.
What is the dispute?
The 500 claim is based on the number of farmers who claimed APR in the last year, but it does not include those who claimed business property relief (BPR).
That is a tax exemption used for things like expensive farm machinery, and under the new rules has been combined with APR.
The combined exemption will be that £1m figure, and because the number of farms claiming BPR has not been calculated, critics say the government has no way of knowing how many farms will be affected.
For example, a used sprayer on AutoTrader can go for close to £400,000 which would eat up a significant amount of that allowance.
The National Farmers Union has said that two-thirds of the UK's farms are worth over one million, with over 200,000 in the country.
Tom Bradshaw, the NFU president, said: “Far from protecting smaller family farms, which is what ministers say they’re doing, they’re actually protecting private houses in the country with a few acres let out for grazing while disproportionately hammering actual, food-producing farms, which are, on paper, much more valuable."
Labour says that farms worth up to £3m could be exempt, because married couples are also allowed to claim up to £1m tax free.
However, Jeremy Moody from the Central Association of Agricultural Valuers said this would only apply to jointly-owned farms where neither spouse had any personal assets.
What has the Prime Minister said?
Sir Keir Starmer insisted: "I do understand the concern.
“But for a typical case, which is parents with a farm they want to pass on to one of their children, by the time you’ve taken into account not only the exemption for the farm property itself, but also the exemption for spouse to spouse, then parent to child, it’s £3m before any inheritance tax will be payable.
“That’s why I am absolutely confident the vast majority of farms and farmers will not be affected by this. It’s important for us to keep communicating how that works. Over the £3m, it’s then 20% rather than the usual rate and it’s payable over 10 years.”
What have the protestors said?
Those opposed to the plans say the changes to tax will make farming unaffordable, and when farmers die their children will be forced to sell the land.
Television host Jeremy Clarkson, who owns a farm, wrote in the Sunday Times: "Thousands and thousands of farms right across the British Isles are being run by people who learnt everything from their dad and will pass all they know on to their kids.
"But is that going to be possible any more? Because now, when Dad dies, there will be a tax bill. And the only possible way of paying it will be by selling up. Rachel Reeves, then, looks to have killed farming."
Critics have pointed out that when the presenter, who makes the hugely successful Clarkson's Farm on his property, bought the £4.25m estate he wrote: "Land is a better investment than any bank can offer. The Government doesn’t get any of my money when I die."
Daniel Spours, a tenant farmer from north Northumberland, travelled to Whitehall to protest against changes to inheritance tax and carbon rules which he said will affect the price of fertiliser.
Mr Spours told the PA news agency: “We are about £60,000 worse off next year from payments that have been slashed by the Government.
“Going forward, there is more taxes to come on fertiliser that’s going to affect us hugely as well, so it’s looking pretty grim.”
Could this affect the food supply?
That depends how far the farmers are willing to take their protests.
Around 60% of the food consumed in the UK is grown by domestic farms, with the rest imported.
The government says it has contingency plans in place for any shortages.
Policing minister Dame Diana Johnson told Sky News: "Issues around food security are obviously national security issues.
“There are plans in place, there are contingencies always in place to deal with that, but I’m confident that won’t happen.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel