The Scottish Government say it has been left with ‘no choice’ but to means test their replacement for the Winter Fuel Payment.
The decision follows Chancellor Rachel Reeves restricting the annual payment to those on pension credit or certain other benefits as part of her plan to tackle a £22 billion black hole.
According to ministers in Edinburgh that left them with a £160 million funding shortfall.
Read More:
-
Scottish Government finds ‘additional funding’ it says could avert bin strikes
-
Sir Tom Hunter seeks support for 'life-changing' social enterprise that blew him away
-
The hidden humanitarian crises being helped by Scotland's emergency fund
Winter Fuel Payments were devolved following the Smith Commission, with the new Pension Age Winter Heating Payment (PAWHP) due to be paid out for the first time later this year.
Initially, the plan was to keep it like-for-like, with all those above state pension age eligible for a single annual payment of between £100 and £300 for individuals.
However, Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville confirmed that the PAWHP would now be deferred to 2025/26.
She said means-testing the benefit means around 900,000 would lose out, with just 130,000 receiving the payment.
Ms Somerville said: "This is a necessary decision when faced with such a deep cut to our funding and in the most challenging financial circumstances since devolution."
Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes accused Labour of damaging devolution.
She said: “The Chancellor announced this cut to the Winter Fuel Payment just weeks before the Scottish Parliament is due to take on responsibility for the payment – and without any consultation with the Scottish Government.
“Devolving a policy weeks after cutting its budget by almost 90% is disrespectful to everybody involved in shaping the new Scottish policy.
"Not only does it drive a coach and horses through the devolution settlement, it ignores the disproportionate importance of this payment to households in Scotland, who face harsher winters and higher fuel costs.
“We and many others called for the UK Government to rethink this approach - or at least allow more time for a proper consultation - but they have not changed course.
"There is an eerie silence from Labour politicians north of the border, who would have been the first and loudest to condemn the Scottish Government if the roles were reversed."
Scottish Conservative social security spokesman Miles Briggs said: “The SNP Government’s decision to follow Labour’s abolition of the universal winter fuel payment is a hammer blow to many Scottish pensioners.”
He criticised the SNP for its “inept mismanagement” of the economy, claiming it was this that meant ministers could not afford universal payments for older Scots.
Mr Briggs insisted: “The SNP could have chosen not to implement this measure – despite their protests, they seem able to find money at the last minute when it suits them.
“But instead, they’ve opted to pass the costs on to Scottish pensioners and dishonestly pretend they had no choice in the matter.
“The SNP, like Labour, have chosen to betray many vulnerable pensioners. This is an essential benefit and people who have worked their whole lives deserve to be able to heat their homes in winter.”
A UK Government spokesperson said: “The £22 billion black hole in the public finances the UK Government inherited from the previous administration has required us to take difficult decisions.
"We are working closely with the Scottish Government to make this as smooth a transition as possible, and more importantly ensure eligible pensioners continue to receive support.
“The UK Government has protected the poorest pensioners by ensuring people on pension credit or certain other income-related benefits will continue to receive the payment.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel