Douglas Ross has said he will back Rishi Sunak’s emergency Rwanda plan legislation in what could be a make-or-break vote for the beleaguered Prime Minister.
The Scottish Conservative leader, who is both an MP and an MSP, said something needed to be done to stop people crossing the channel and risking their lives.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak defends Rwanda policy as Tories split over Bill
The Tories are in turmoil over the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill.
On Wednesday night, Robert Jenrick quit as immigration minister, saying the plan did “not go far enough. ”
He and others on the right of the party want the Bill — which legally declares Rwanda to be a safe country — to close off all possible grounds of challenge under either national or international law.
Earlier in the day, former home secretary Suella Braverman told the BBC that the Bill in its current state would fail.
She said that in the “very litigious field” of asylum law “the reality is and the sorry truth is that it won’t work and it will not stop the boats”.
There are also reportedly concerns from more moderate Tory backbenchers.
Pressed on whether he would call a general election if he could not get the legislation through parliament, Mr Sunak said: “We’ve got to finish the job and I’m going to see this thing through.
“I’m confident I can get this thing done.”
READ MORE: UK Covid inquiry: Boris Johnson defends 'let it rip'comments
Speaking to journalists in Holyrood, Mr Ross confirmed he would back the Bill on Tuesday.
He said there had been “far too many lives lost in the English Channel”.
He added: “It’s absolutely vital that we use every policy available to prevent people from making an extremely dangerous crossing – we see far too many lives lost in the English Channel.
“That’s why the Prime Minister has looked at the ruling from the Supreme Court, he’s looked at the legislation that can be brought through the UK Parliament to deter people from making that dangerous crossing, from putting their life at risk and also to ensure the people that benefit from this currently – the people smugglers – that route is stopped from them.
“I will be supporting the Bill when it comes to Parliament.”
During First Minister’s Questions, Humza Yousaf said it was a “dark day” for the UK.
“A country that once welcomed immigrants, including my grandfather to the country, in fact, begged him to come and others to come to work in their factories, to drive buses, due to the labour shortages that were seen at that time.”
Mr Yousaf said: “What successive UK governments have done – Labour and Conservatives – is they have, bit by bit, dismantled our immigration and indeed our asylum processes.
“On immigration, the latest announcements mean that we’re asking – the UK Government is asking – migrants to come here to look after our own family members but doing so by abandoning their own family members back home.
“On asylum, the UK Government has virtually eliminated any practical legal route for those that are fleeing war or persecution.
“The policies of the UK Government in this respect are not only morally repugnant, but they are economically illiterate."
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf grilled over Scottish education
The scale of unease over the Rwanda plan has led to speculation that unhappy MPs could submit letters to the chair of the backbench 1922 committee asking for a vote of no confidence.
Under party rules, that would require 53 Tory MPs to trigger.
Cabinet minister Chris Heaton-Harris played down that prospect, telling LBC: “I think it’s highly unlikely, very unlikely. I’d say vanishingly small.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel