Labour has defended its plan to tackle illegal immigration by striking a bespoke deal with the European Union after the Tories branded it an “open border policy”.
Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the Conservatives were reduced to “talking garbage” because they had been unable to make their own approach work.
Sir Keir Starmer this week set out Labour’s plan for detailing with small boat crossings in the Channel, a key issue for swing voters in so-called Red Wall seats in England.
Channel crossings have so far passed 23,000 this year.
The UK Labour leader said people-smuggling gangs would be treated like terrorists, and vowed to recruit an extra 1,000 Home Office caseworkers to clear the asylum backlog.
More than 175,000 people who have applied for asylum are waiting for an initial decision.
Labour said ending the backlog would let the Government end the use of hotels, barges and former military sites to house asylum seekers, which cost around £2billion a year.
On a visit to The Hague in the Netherlands on Thursday, where he met officials from Europol, Sir Keir promised to “smash the criminal gangs” profiting from small boat crossings using serious crime prevention orders which already restrict the movement of serious offenders like extremists and drug traffickers.
Most controversially, he suggested a deal with Brussels to let the UK return people who cross the Channel, provided the UK took a quota of asylum seekers arriving in the EU.
Despite the Tories mulling the idea themselves, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak claimed this could lead to 100,000 EU migrants coming to the UK each year.
Senior Tory ministers said that if a returns deal with the EU was in place last year, it would have forced the UK to take 124,614 so-called “illegal migrants” in 2022, as a population share of the 966,000 people who applied to the bloc for asylum last year.
But Ms Cooper said the UK would not join the existing EU quota scheme, under which countries must take an agreed share of migrants or be fined, as it was not in the EU.
She told LBC: “Unfortunately this is just Rishi Sunak making things up because his plan isn’t working to tackle the Tory boats chaos.
“We’ve always said that, yes, the routes need to be capped.
“We’re not talking about this European quota scheme at all.
“We wouldn’t be part of that. That’s part of what the Conservatives have made up.”
However she said Labour would seek some form of returns agreement with other European countries if it was in Government, and that this would see “controlled and managed but safe routes for children who have family in the UK”.
Tory Home Office minister Chris Philp told Times Radio: “I think his policy has no credibility and the British public don’t want to see 100,000 of Europe’s illegal immigrants being shipped over here under Keir Starmer’s open border policy.”
Labour said it would also create extra court capacity to speed up asylum legal challenges, plus a new returns unit, again backed by 1,000 staff, to triage and fast-track removals in a bid to “take back control of our asylum system”.
Ending the Tory Government’s Rwanda deportation plan, currently held up in the courts, would also find money to spend on the proposals, Labour said.
Besides the Tory criticism, Labour was criticised by TUC president Matt Wrack, who said Sir Keir was in “danger of pandering to right wing Tory rhetoric” on immigration.
Sir Keir will be in Montreal, Canada over the weekend for a summit of “progressive” politicians ahead of a visit to France next week to meet President Emmanuel Macron.
No10 downplayed the significance of the Paris trip, saying it was “not unusual”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel