Nausea. Is it the weariness or the shock? Perhaps both. Donald Trump will be the 47th US President and we all have to live with it.
Hold your loved ones close. It isn’t anxiety talking but a sober statement of fact to say the world has just become a more unstable place and we on these small chilly islands are more lonely within it.
Damn the despair. We have to get used to it, fast. And then we have to respond.
First, a brief assessment of the implications. Trump’s dislike of Nato, unsupportive stance on Ukraine and weak opposition to Russian aggression, will surely embolden Vladimir Putin. Trump says he will end the Ukraine war, but no one thinks he will favour Kiev – we can only guess at the level of despondency there.
Read more by Rebecca McQuillan
- Uh-oh, are the SNP coming unstuck again?
- Why keeping smartphones out of kids’ hands is the way forward
The President-elect continues to undermine Nato, casually inviting Russia to attack any Nato state that spends less than two per cent of GDP on security, saying the US wouldn’t intervene. It isn’t easily dismissed as campaign rhetoric; his attacks on Nato have been consistent for years. He is weakening it as a defensive pact. The Baltic States must be nervous.
For American democracy, Donald Trump is dangerous, a practised liar and populist with authoritarian instincts. His win will embolden similar leaders across Europe.
Meanwhile, his threat to introduce tariffs on all imports of 10-20 per cent would hit European economies hard and could result in a damaging international trade war. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research, a think tank, predicts that Trump’s tariffs would halve the growth rate of Britain’s economy and John Swinney is already warning they would hit the Scotch whisky industry. Even if Trump’s simplistic approach weren’t pursued to the letter (it would increase prices in the US) we can expect a damaging, protectionist stance.
Efforts to tackle climate change, now a desperately urgent threat, have been dealt a vicious blow by the re-election of a president who calls climate change a “hoax” and wants to “drill, baby, drill”. He would likely pull the US out of the Paris Agreement.
It is probably this that will have the most dire long-term consequences for the largest number of people.
And the transatlantic “special relationship”? It’s starting to sound like a quaint historical term already. Trump’s attack on the “far left Labour party" for encouraging people to campaign for Harris tells us the golfing billionaire doesn’t give a rat’s ass about Britain.
Make no mistake: Britain had already damaged the special relationship with Brexit – Biden did not prioritise a UK trade deal either. Attitudes are changing. If we continue to delude ourselves that the US is our steadfast bestie, we will be less safe.
Keir Starmer’s government must, of course, have a working relationship with Trump’s White House. Britain must find common ground if it can. Starmer and David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, have been assiduously laying the groundwork for this.
But a breach has occurred. It looks as though our values are diverging. We need other friends and allies – not easy when the last government deliberately blew up our relationship with Europe. Starmer must redouble efforts to shore up those damaged relationships, not in opposition to the US but alongside it, in recognition of this new reality.
There’s no point labouring the point of how all this underscores the sheer lunacy of Brexit. That way lies bitterness and recrimination, and we’ve no time for that. But it’s clear enough that staying in the EU, our largest export market, would have greatly helped buffer the UK economy from the trade instability that is to come, helped bolster democracy in Europe where the far right is on the march and allowed for a more coherent European response to Russia’s threat.
Talk of rejoining the EU would only inflame the populist right, but there is an urgent need for the Labour Government to move closer to the bloc – with the aim of rejoining the customs union.
That idea may not have traction now, but if US tariffs hammer the economy, it would start looking a great deal more attractive.
Entering a customs union was not an option that MPs could agree to back in 2017, as Remainers felt it didn’t go far enough while Leavers made out it would prevent Britain making glorious bilateral trade deals, including with the United States.
That argument, however, was hideously misleading and is now in tatters. The last transparent wisps of those illusory Brexit benefits have long since evaporated. Eight years after the Brexit vote, there is no prospect of any trade deal with the US and the deals the UK has made, such as that with Australia, are worth so little you need a magnifying glass to see the numbers.
A customs union with Europe, then, should be in Labour’s sights. Governments have to re-evalaute previous commitments in the light of changed circumstances, and this is one hell of a changed circumstance.
But that is not all. Those who believe in liberal values – respect for democratic institutions and the rule of law, belief in equality and individual liberty, protecting minorities and evidence-based debate – must get used to working together. Their squabbling only delights the forces of authoritarianism.
That applies to the SNP and Labour. Constitutional differences aside, John Swinney and Keir Starmer are natural allies in this much bigger struggle.
Thank goodness Scottish independence is no longer a realistic near-term project. I say that not to disrespect those who sincerely believe in it, but because with independence off the table for the foreseeable, it gives these two centre-left parties space to work together in an unprecedented way to make our shared democracy stronger, in defence of shared values. The break-up of the UK would be seen in Moscow as a blow to the power of one of Russia’s greatest foes, as indeed it would be. Now is not the time.
Something bigger is at stake here. Those who believe in democratic values in Britain and all its constituent parts, must link arms and brace themselves for what is to come.
Rebecca McQuillan is a freelance journalist specialising in politics and Scottish affairs. She can be found on X at @BecMcQ
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel