I’m not particularly proud to say this, and it’s taken a while and it’s been a bit of a struggle to be honest, but I appear to be out of the public health system. I now have a private GP and a private dentist, mainly because I felt like I had no choice. Is this the way it’s going to be?
Here’s how it happened. First: the dentist. I’ve always had trouble with my teeth and need lots of work and I’ve had the same brilliant dentist for more than 30 years. However, there came a point when he was withdrawing from NHS work and in the nicest possible way, he gave me a choice: go private or leave the practice. So I went private.
I do not blame him for doing this. The British Dental Association says rising costs and inadequate fees can leave dentists carrying out NHS treatments at a loss, which is unsustainable. And while the Scottish Government has made some changes, the tinkering hasn’t fixed the underlying problems. Obviously, dentists going private makes things worse on the face of it, but it’s understandable. Would you keep working at a loss?
A similar situation applies to GPs. There aren’t enough of them, the number of doctors getting out of the job is rising, and there’s increasing pressure from the patients, who are getting older and sicker and fatter. The BMA did a survey of GPs in Scotland recently which revealed that just five per cent of them believe their practice is in a long-term sustainable position. Five per cent. Blimey.
If you don’t believe it, try phoning one, like I did a few weeks ago. Could I have an appointment please? Is it an emergency? No but I would like to see someone quickly. We are entirely booked out for a month. OK, could I have an appointment after a month? No, you will have to call back later in the month when the appointments reopen. When will that be? We don’t know, call back at some point in the future and find out. I put the phone down and reached for my copy of Kafka for a possible explanation.
What I did then, I’m afraid, was I phoned up a private GP and got an appointment immediately; there’s also a subscription service which means I can see the doctor, in person or remotely, swiftly and easily. Like it used to be in the 90s. Remember it? Phoning up the surgery and getting an appointment without really thinking about it? The last ten years or so have erased all that.
Read more
Mark Smith: Is this normal? I’m starting to like John Swinney
Mark Smith: I am not proud to be British
But there’s some hope at least. Keir Starmer is starting to talk about reform and most importantly, he’s no longer relying on the idea that the system can be fixed with more money alone; and some more; and more; more please. The new report on the NHS in England which Starmer commissioned says recent investment in hospitals has led to a 17% increase in the workforce since 2019 and yet treatment has collapsed. It also says it’s implausible that more cash will improve performance i.e. money doesn’t necessarily mean better.
I’m also pleased to see Starmer appears to be leading the way on what kind of reform is needed, and there will be lessons for Scotland. The plan appears to be that investment will move from hospitals to communities and we know why: a large number of NHS beds, in England and Scotland, are occupied by people waiting for social care support or care at home. It is the crux of the problem.
There’s already been talk of tackling this in Scotland, and there have been attempts at integrating health and social care, but there certainly hasn’t been the kind of wholesale shift towards care at home and in the community that the UK Government’s report says is necessary. Indeed, as the report demonstrates, there’s still a culture of care centred round hospitals, which means they get most of the money. It’s one of the reasons the care we receive in the community – at the dentist or the GP surgery – is in such a poor way.
The hope now is that Starmer sees all of this and that in England (with Scotland following forthwith hopefully) a greater proportion of the budget will be spent on GPs, social care, community services and preventative care. But as the PM himself acknowledged, the change will take years not months and that’s not great news for the people who are on waiting lists now. Or people trying to get an appointment with their GP. Or people trying to find an NHS dentist.
Which means, I think, that more people will do what I did and go private. Was it an easy decision to make? In some ways no. Ideally, I’d like to use the NHS, which I help pay for in taxes. Anyone who goes private also needs to acknowledge that not everyone is able to take the paid option.
On the other hand, there’s an argument, which makes some sense, that patients who go private take a bit of the strain off the NHS, even though, if we’re honest, that’s probably just an attempt to make the decision appear selfless which it isn’t. A better way to describe it would be, if not selfish, then certainly self-centred. I couldn’t get the service I wanted and if I paid for it, I could, so I did. Part of me wants to apologise for that but only part. The other part feels like I’ve done the right thing. Take a look out there. Can you really blame me?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel