Is it just me or does Scotland feel a bit 1990s just now? I watch John Swinney, I speak to people in the SNP, I see the predictions for the next election, and the same parallel keeps occurring to me. Mid-1990s. A party past its peak. The bucketfuls of trouble that come with a long time in office. An electorate that’s a bit tired of you. And Oasis selling concert tickets. I guess what I’m saying is the First Minister is facing his own version of the ‘90s. He is the SNP’s John Major.
To be clear, this is not meant to be an unflattering comparison: John Major was – like John Swinney – able, personable and pragmatic. But, also like John Swinney, when John Major came to power, he was landed with a set of circumstances that even the best would struggle with. It’s the political law of entropy: systems decay, things go wrong, and both Major and Swinney were landed with the legacy of a leader who’d dominated everything for years. Which can only mean one thing: if John Swinney is John Major, then Nicola Sturgeon is Margaret Thatcher, and yes, I know I’m pushing things a bit but it’s too funny a comparison to leave out so there it is.
You may also have noticed, if the 1990s parallel has occurred to you too, that John Swinney appears to be trying to handle the situation much as John Major did 30 years ago. Look at the First Minister’s speech to the SNP conference the other day. There was a lot of the usual stuff – complaints about Westminster, a commitment to wipe out poverty, the promise of a better future under independence – but it always helps I think to count the number of times certain words crop up and this year’s tally is interesting. The word “independence”: 14 times. The words “Nicola Sturgeon”: 0.
This is remarkable stuff really, given the recent history of the party. Until not so long ago, everyone in the SNP was eager to mention Sturgeon as much as they could and praise her and tell us how brilliant she was. However, in another surprising parallel with Thatcher, Sturgeon has been transformed from a leader who was once revered to someone who’s politically D for Dead. And Swinney has reacted to the situation by doing with Sturgeon what Major did with Thatcher: trying to move on, not mentioning her much or at all, and pretending like she doesn’t really exist. Once a giant, now a ghost.
There’s also been some revealing stuff about the relationship between Swinney and Sturgeon in the new BBC documentary on the SNP. According to Swinney himself, he spoke to Sturgeon in 2016 about her strategy of calling for a second independence referendum immediately after the Brexit vote. You may remember, because you’ve probably still got the scars, that as soon as the Brexit vote was announced, up popped Sturgeon at her podium to tell us another Scottish referendum was now “on the table”. It turned out actually no, it wasn’t.
What Swinney told the documentary is he pretty much made it clear to Sturgeon at the time this was a bad idea. “I can remember saying to Nicola as she was formulating the message she was going to convey in the aftermath of the Brexit referendum – was she sure she wanted to say so firmly that she was opening up dialogue about a further referendum. I have to say I was nervous, because I was still concerned by how we were able to motivate people in Scotland when we had just had one (a referendum) in 2014.”
Read more
Mark Smith: I am not proud to be British
Mark Smith: ‘At last, it’s Govan’s turn’: what Glasgow’s new bridge could really do
Now, you may say that a certain person who crops up in politics, Mr Retrospective, is up to his old tricks here, but if we accept the conversation happened, it reflects well on Mr Swinney. As he told the conference, he joined the SNP when he was 15 and is presumably as committed to independence as the most passionate members of the party. But in 2016 he could see that trying to get support for another Scottish referendum was a big ask and pragmatism won over passion, at least it did with him.
I must say: I like John Swinney for this because, on the whole, I like pragmatic politicians, even though there’s quite a few in the SNP having a go at him for it. What the critics are suggesting is that he’s wrong and that, somehow, somewhere, somewhen, Sturgeon really could have exploited the Brexit vote to get another Scottish referendum and win it, if only she’d done things a bit differently. But it’s Swinney who’s right: can you imagine trying to get motivated for another Scottish referendum in 2016 and can you imagine changing your mind? Pity Sturgeon didn’t listen eh?
Mr Swinney is demonstrating his pragmatism in other ways too. When I spoke to Alastair Campbell the other week, he told me he’d bumped into Swinney at a football match and the First Minister told him how much better it would feel to have someone in No10 you could engage with. Mr Swinney has also said Labour is much happier to work with the Scottish government than the Tories were and because Swinney’s a pragmatist and a nice guy, he’ll respond to it I think. The only problem with that is that if the UK Government is being all nice and helpful, it does make it harder to slag them off, which has been the defining SNP strategy for years.
Not that Mr Swinney isn’t willing to give it a go still. In his conference speech, he said Keir Starmer was ushering in “a new era of austerity” and blamed Labour for the Scottish Government's cuts. Only thing is it was the Scottish Government that froze council tax, and agreed big public sector pay deals, and reiterated their commitment to universal benefits. As the Scottish Fiscal Commission put it: “while UK government policies contribute to the pressures on the Scottish budget, much of the pressure comes from the Scottish government’s own decisions”. So: nice try I guess.
(Image: John Major)
But having said that, John Swinney – pragmatic, able – is a big improvement on the ones-that-came-before. I say pragmatic because, although the word independence cropped up in his speech 14 times, the subject was more like a backdrop than front-of-stage. He told Nicola Sturgeon in 2016 he was concerned about trying to motivate people over a referendum, and eight years later he’s clearly still thinking along the same lines.
The fact he’s rolled things back in this way is also a sign, I think, of someone reading the runes pretty well and realising that going large on independence now is not going to change things in 2026. Don’t misunderstand me: John Swinney is still heading for defeat at the next election, just like John Major was heading for defeat in 1996, but at least Swinney can try to be different in one respect. At least he can try to sense where the voters are, and talk with them rather than at them. At least he can try to appear pragmatic and reasonable. At least he can try to limit the damage.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel