It is not every week that Michael O’Leary acquires a legion of fans for something he has said, but fair play to the Ryanair CEO. His call to curb alcohol consumption at airports landed well with a lot of people.
O’Leary wants passengers to be restricted to two drinks per journey to curb what he says is an increase in antisocial behaviour and violence.
“We don’t want to begrudge people having a drink. But we don’t allow people to drink-drive, yet we keep putting them up in aircraft at 33,000 feet,” he said, adding it was difficult for airlines to identify inebriated people at the gate, especially when boarding in a group.
But Sir Tim Martin, founder of JD Wetherspoon, says O’Leary is out of touch. He said there had been “no complaints about our pubs from the airport authorities or airlines” in “recent years”, adding Wetherspoons airport pubs no longer serve shots.
“Years ago we stopped selling ‘shooters’ at airports, as well as ‘double-up’ offers. Ryanair, in contrast, offers a discount on Irish whiskey if a double is ordered,” he said.
Ryanair identified four airports that airline staff find particularly problematic – Liverpool, Manchester, Glasgow and Edinburgh. I’d like to disagree but experience tells me it’s a fair cop.
Read more
Why stop at curbing boozing when there are so many other annoyances once the flight is underway? I’d like to outlaw children booting the back of your seat, particularly when you’ve asked the so-called responsible adult with them to have a word, please.
I’d also ban people eating smelly sandwiches, people who take their shoes and socks off and pick their feet (true story), and people who put their seats back on a domestic flight.
While we are at it, the cheap headphones lot with their tinny racket can take a hike. Ditto the armrest hoggers, the leg spreaders, the snorers and the shouters.
In fact, let’s just ban people, full stop. Except for us, of course.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel