Nearly a year ago, the Chancellor increased excise duty on Scotch Whisky and other spirits by an eye-watering 10.1%. It was the biggest such tax hike in four decades and cemented the UK’s position as the G7 country with the highest level of duty on spirits – not a league table any government should wish to be atop of.
Fast forward almost 11 months, and HMRC data shows that excise duty revenue from spirits is down by more than £100 million since August compared to the same period last year. Not a forecast, not a model, real-world incontrovertible evidence that increasing tax on Scotch has literally resulted in less money that could be spent on public services.
As our new government takes control, this should be a reminder of the need to back business if we’re to see the type of economic growth the country needs.
No other country treats a tentpole industry and world-renowned, premium product in the way the UK treats Scotch Whisky. It’s inconceivable that the French would tax Champagne and put it at a competitive disadvantage to other products. But the UK manages it – nearly three quarters of the cost of a bottle of Scotch is claimed by the taxman. If you order a dram in an Edinburgh pub, you will be paying more than double the excise duty you would be on the same dram in a Parisian bar. And per unit of alcohol, you’ll pay four times more in tax than on a pint of cider.
The discrimination against spirits including Scotch Whisky is clear to see, and the situation must change. The new government should be bringing the UK’s duty on Scotch and other spirits closer to the European average over the course of the next parliament. Doing so can deliver much needed growth, create jobs, boost investment and support hospitality. And it would show that the incoming government in Westminster cared about Scotland and its economic success – 70% of UK spirits production lies north of the border.
It's disappointing we’re not already backing an important sector. Scotch Whisky alone generates more than £7 billion a year for the economy and is the UK’s number one food and drink export. Distilleries are Scotland’s number one tourist destination, attracting millions of visitors who spend money in surrounding communities. Over 40 bottles of Scotland’s national drink are exported every second to countries around the world – and the demand for Scotch has opened the door for other products to grow in international markets.
And, as part of the wider spirits industry, Scotch helps generate a third of all alcohol sales in pubs, restaurants and bars. That’s despite being locked out of the government’s so-called ‘Brexit pubs guarantee’ that cuts duty on cider and beer sold in hospitality businesses and ignores the importance of spirits to a publican’s revenue, or the millions of consumers whose drink of choice is a dram or cocktail rather than a pint.
The path to growth is not through increasing the tax burden on the producers of world-class products such as Scotch Whisky. It is through providing support, stability and enabling further investment that benefits hospitality businesses and local communities, and advances our national sustainability goals such as net zero emissions.
HMRC’s own figures show that raising what is already one of the highest levels of excise duty in the world doesn’t work. The numbers don’t lie – we have missed out on revenue that could be used for our public services. The next government must learn this lesson and understand that increasing tax on the likes of Scotch Whisky is not a path for success.
Get that right and use the next parliament to bring spirits duty closer to the European average, and we will see growth and more money from business going into the Exchequer. Not because they’re taxed to the hilt, but because they’ve been given more opportunity to succeed.
That is the cocktail for success.
Mark Kent, chief executive of the Scotch Whisky Association
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here