Dogs seem a perfectly nice bunch of creatures. It’s their human owners I can’t stand.
At the risk of becoming a figure of national contempt (what’s new, I hear cynics cry), there’s a certain breed of dog-owner whose selfish stupidity brings out my inner extremist.
I’m probably more likely to get cancelled for slagging off dog-owners than demanding a nationwide baby-ban. I know this is my personal cross to bear. Most folk own dogs, so I’m screaming into the wind like Lear upon the heath.
It’s this time of year which flips my switch. Sunny days bring out the type who think humans should be subservient to their animals. Walk through your local park and you’ll find them: ‘the cult of the very long dog leads’.
You’ll be strolling under the trees and there they are, a cluster of goonish dog-walkers standing on opposite sides of the pavement grinning gormlessly at each other, their six-foot-long dog leads turning the road into one of those scenes from Mission Impossible, where Tom Cruise abseils from the ceiling and then has to tip-toe his way like an acrobat through laser-beams which trigger deadly alarms.
READ MORE
Neil Mackay on the horror of life returning to the 1970s
Neil Mackay on the existential dread of finding out you’re getting old
How am I - or that small child riding a bike, or that nice couple with their pram, or that old lady - meant to walk along a road when these drongos have turned the place into a spiderweb of interlocking dog leads.
My eyeballs sweat in fury. And yes, I know there’s many more troubling issues in the world, but I live inside my brain and my brain doesn’t like self-centred dunder-whelps.
Sometimes those in ‘the cult of the incredibly long lead’ will walk towards you bold as brass - them on one side of the road, their dog on the other - and expect you to move out of the way for their lead. It’s tantamount to an act of war.
I simply stand there, staring at these ill-reared brats until they move either the lead, or themselves. I’d wait until the crack of doom before I’d budge for these bumptious park-killing cretins.
Evidently, you may say, ‘well, Neilly, old boy, can’t you hop off the path and onto the grass on your daily peregrinations through the municipal parks of Glasgow?’. And I’d say, ‘yes, of course, I could … if dog owners hadn’t allowed their animals to turn the green brown’. Grass seems, to some, like one big pretty dog toilet.
Clearly, others are more considerate. They watch their dog hobbling around freakishly at its toilette, then hang the results in lovely little blue bags from a bush. How wonderful. Here was I, looking for a bloom of rhododendron, yet I receive a placky bag of dog curls instead.
Call me obsessed, but I’ve been keeping a newspaper clippings file marked ‘Dog Idiots’. I’ve got articles in there about people buying dog translator apps. (Let me sell you some magic beans). There’s a story about ‘barkitecture’, the art of designing homes around dogs. I’d actually jail these people. I’m don’t know for what, but I’m sure we can invent a crime.
A piece about puppy yoga simply broke me. I writhed on the floor in silent rage, praying for a pandemic which specifically targets people who take their dogs to new age therapy.
These are the same halfwits who dress their dogs in day-glo jumpsuits. Pity me. If I see another dog in a baby-grow, I’ll abduct the animal for its own safety. How can you say you love a creature then make a total side-show spectacle out it, for your stupid entertainment?
Look, I’ve even seen people push dogs around in prams. Jail, right? Spare me these dumbbells and their dog babies.
The worse type is what I call the ‘metaphysical dog idiot’ - the ones who’ve somehow decided dogs are more important than humans. You hear these nihilistic, droning, old bores everywhere. ‘Dogs are so much nicer than people’. Shut up. Idiot.
One day you’ll probably be lying dead on your living floor all alone - because clearly no other human is going to like you or care about you if this is the way you carry on - and your beloved dog will be eating your face off, as you aren’t able to open their can of beefy chunks anymore. How nice will your furry friend be then?
Here’s a good tip for social media: if you see someone with a dog avatar as their profile picture, block them. The dog avatar people are among the most horrible, nasty, cruel monsters on the face of the planet. Watch for a Twitter pile-on, and it’ll be the dog avatars leading the attack.
I haven’t even touched on the chimps who stare glaikitly while their dog barks at old people or children without lifting a damn, lazy entitled finger. Or the wannabe gangsters stoating about with monster dogs on the end of leashes.
If you want to look like a gangster, let’s treat you like one. Anyone with a devil dog should be subjected to stop-and-search measures by police every ten minutes for the remainder of their life.
READ MORE
Neil Mackay on biding goodbye to his dark side
What Scotland's Lorraine Kelly can teach UK about class
Clearly, this issue taxes my liberalism and I’d soon fill the country’s jails with dog-owners on a series of trumped up charges - another good reason why I never entered politics.
However, there’s a serious side to this. We call ourselves a nation of dog lovers but we often treat them abysmally. We buy dogs bred specifically for deformity, with squished faces and bandy legs. They suffer their entire lives and die early. We bought dogs in their thousands during Covid - then when it ended, abandoned them. Dog lovers? Wise up.
We don’t just need dog licences, we need mandatory training for humans before they can own a dog.
I don’t own a dog. My family had dogs when I was little. They were lovely creatures. But I don’t have the lifestyle to look after a dog. I struggle to keep my goldfish alive.
Would I like a dog? Yes, when I retire. I reiterate, it’s not dogs I detest, it’s their owners. If I get a dog, I’d definitely take some lessons on how to look after of it. And I’d buy a short lead.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel