SOMETIMES I wonder what it would be like to have a son. My wife and I have two wonderful daughters. They’re grown up, forging careers and relationships and conquering the world as best their beleaguered generation can.
Occasionally, my wife and I will see some lovely wee boy playing with his parents and we’ll share a glance. We don’t have to put into words what we’re thinking. We’re pondering how a son would have changed us.
I guess my own parents felt the same after my brother and I grew up. They must have wondered what life would have been like with a daughter.
However, the deeper we get into the 21st century, the more I, unhappily, realise I was maybe lucky. Raising boys seems a hard road to walk.
I say "unhappily" because, as a man, the state of masculinity has always troubled me, and what’s happening to young men today is in many ways heartbreaking.
Young men are in a state of crisis. They seem lost. Misogyny is epidemic in schools. Violent, degrading online pornography saturates young men’s lives. Loneliness stalks millions of us.
Dangerous voices - who just a few years ago would have been seen as pathetic cranks - are now "influencers" for young men. The likes of Andrew Tate are a plague on masculinity.
Teachers are now calling for inquiries into harmful content and online misogyny. This all seems a far cry from the late 1980s and early 1990s, when my generation came of age.
That was the era of the so-called "New Man". We wanted to break with the past: to be good partners, to respect women, to work hard as parents and forge deep bonds with our children. We turned our backs on old notions of masculinity. Though, evidently, trying and succeeding are not the same thing; but we did try.
Now, for so many young men, those ideas seem killed by the brute called social media. Today, my friends with sons tell stories that chill me; stories which confirm how lucky I was to have girls.
And I feel ashamed saying "lucky". It’s cruel to my own sex. And, clearly, not all young men are in crisis.
But I’ve friends deeply scared by the changes that came over their sons in their mid-teens. The gateway drug seems to always be extreme pornography. Within a few steps they’re mainlining the hateful misogyny of the Tates of this world.
Neil Mackay’s Big Read on why the trouble with men has reached crisis point
Neil Mackay talks to the Scottish literary star who wants to fix ‘broken men’
Neil Mackay on the men who are swapping bread-winning for child-rearing
Now, I’m no anti-pornography morality campaigner. Consenting adults can do whatever they please. But pornography has changed. I made a documentary years ago about the effects of extreme online pornography on men and it horrified me.
Women were "things" to use. Many young men found sex impossible after prolonged exposure to extreme pornography; reality and fantasy were so at odds they were effectively impotent with "real" women.
Not long after I made that documentary, I started developing another film, this time about "toxic masculinity". I worked the idea up, but something didn’t feel quite right. As a journalist, I go on my gut and some crucial element I couldn’t identify was missing from the film. Eventually, I let the idea drop.
Today, I realise what was wrong with the idea. It was the very term "toxic masculinity". If we want boys and young men to be better human beings we won’t achieve anything if we tell them they’re trash.
Look, don’t get me wrong. "Toxic masculinity" exists. It saturates society. But we won’t change anything by shaming and effectively pointing and laughing.
I no longer sneer at Brexit voters - or Trump voters, for that matter when I’m in America. I did for a long time and it was wrong. I’ve changed my approach; not because I agree with them - quite the opposite - but because I’d like to get through to them. Nobody listens to you, if you insult them.
Young men and boys will do the same if we keep telling them they’re trash, because that’s what the word "toxic" implies. It says "you’re disgusting".
I was a rebellious boy - not a bully or a misogynist, but recklessly anti-authority. If adults told me to behave because I was a disgrace or making a fool of myself, it just intensified my behaviour.
It was only when a few smart teachers spoke to me not as a trouble-maker, but as someone who was perhaps a little troubled as a teen and needed a friendly hand to help them onto a better path, that I started to listen.
These teachers knew I wanted to be a writer. They switched me on to great novelists and said "why not emulate them rather than snarl at the world all the time?".
They didn’t humiliate me, they encouraged me. We need to shift away from the humiliating language of "toxic masculinity", and instead present a vision of positive masculinity.
Men can be kind, wise and courageous; we can represent self-sacrifice; the nurturing qualities of fatherhood; we can be inspirational leaders and mentors; champions of the arts and sport; voices of guidance, of empathy.
The Labour Party is considering a men’s health strategy to address the crisis in masculinity if it takes power. The Scottish Government has started talking about a “positive vision” of masculinity. These are wise steps.
However, I’d caution the Scottish Government. Humza Yousaf now rightly speaks of “a vision for masculinity that is uplifting and positive so the negative male role models we are all aware of can be challenged”. I applaud this. However, the Government press machine still talks of “toxic masculinity”.
That mixed messaging is self-defeating. You can present all the positive role models available, but keep telling boys they’re toxic, and they’ll switch off.
None of this means the pain of being a girl or young woman today is any less. Indeed, women’s suffering is often much more damaging. Women are, evidently, the victims of the worst of men.
Surely, all that matters is changing men for the better, so that young boys and, crucially, young girls live happier, safer lives. I think the only way to achieve that simple, yet seemingly insurmountable, task is to learn that encouragement not shame is the only path to betterment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel