The sight of dehydrated children being handed meagre bottled water rations in Gaza, is surely grounds to reflect on the vitality of water and sanitation in any civilized society.
In 2010, the United Nations General Assembly declared water and sanitation a fundamental human right. Yet the declaration does not bind governments to action. For that, the right must be written into national law.
A cursory review of the countries where the human right to water and sanitation is in primary legislation is revealing. It’s not the wealthy nations. In these countries, the human right to water is ambiguous and emerges by dint of other legislation on, for example, the right to life or dignity. No, it’s countries where portions of the population have felt the full force of being denied the right. Thus, droughts, disputes and pollution have led to primary legislation in, for example, South Africa, Kenya, and Peru. Indeed, the UN declaration emerged from myriad struggles and claims of marginalised people living through water-related injustices.
So why is the human right to water an issue in Scotland now? Three reasons. First, the climate crisis. This spring's rainfall was 30% lower than average and hotter, drier summers are guaranteed by even the most cautious climate forecasts. Island and rural communities' water resources are vulnerable to these changes. Secondly, the Scottish Government will introduce a human rights bill next year. Thirdly, the Government has launched a consultation on the future of water, wastewater and drainage policy.
It is clear to me that access to water and sanitation is a fundamental human right and all governments should bind themselves through legislation to the UN declaration. Legal rights give a voice and agency to citizens on decisions that affect some fundamental good that is under threat. Water resources, if not now, will in the future be under threat. We ought not to wait until marginalised groups are badly affected to implement change. They should be given agency now.
However, making water and sanitation a human right, without sufficient forethought, could open up a hornet’s nest. That might be why so few governments have done so. Translating law into action falls upon technocrats and tumbles down to a suite of organisations; for water in Scotland, these include local authorities, regulators, Scottish Water and consumer groups, all of whom are embedded in the status quo.
It would be unfair to plonk responsibility for delivering the human right to water directly into the lap of a single organisation. The responsibilities and remits of organisations and, importantly, the funding to deliver the human right to water would need to change, which would require government, civil service and organisations to work together to reshape the water policy landscape. It would be nice to believe that fear of tackling these difficult political and administrative issues will not deter the Government from making access to water a human right. The law would stop the collective burying of heads in the sand when it comes to equitable solutions to impending water problems.
Professor Bill Sloan is Royal Academy of Engineering Chair at the University of Glasgow
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here