IS the Deposit Return Scheme a hunk of junk, or a potentially great policy? Here’s the problem: given Scotland’s political culture it’s impossible to know.
We’ve surrendered debate, given up trying to make sense of information and policy. Instead, we hunker down into constitutional bunkers and lob grenades. Every SNP policy is spawned in hell if you’re unionist; every unionist idea is a devilish plot to do down Scotland if you’re nationalist.
This political culture isn’t just wearying. It’s positively detrimental.
One matter is clear, though, when it comes to DRS. It is being used as a proxy war by the Conservative government to undermine devolution. The Tories’ latest attempt to derail the DRS scheme centres on the inclusion of glass. It just doesn’t stack up.
READ MORE: Neil Mackay: Wealth of Scotland's five richest families equals public sector pay bill
A scheme with glass was part of the manifesto supported by all the major Conservative figures with skin in this particular game: Scottish secretary Alister Jack, Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross, and Britain’s Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. What’s changed? Did they suddenly remember there’s an ‘internal market’?
No matter what your side of the political aisle, the one issue surely everyone can agree on, is that in the era of climate change, Scotland - and the rest of Britain - needs better recycling measures. But it seems we would rather trash sense in the interests of partisan constitutional battles.
The SNP cannot get off the hook entirely here...
To read the full article sign up to our Unspun newsletter, delivering the best political insight and analysis at 7pm every weekday. You will find Unspun and more of our newsletters here.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel