It's hard to work out what’s more absurd: the sight of a lump of rock - aka the Stone of Destiny - being carried around on a catafalque as if it’s some dead saint, while pipers played and Humza Yousaf marched behind courtly minions dolled up in their heraldic finery; the fevered yodelling of Alba types denouncing the blessed breeze block’s journey to Westminster as an act of domination by perfidious England; or the Coronation itself, a performance of mass grovelling at the feet of inherited wealth amid a cost of living crisis in which mothers starve themselves to feed their children.
You choose. To me, each is a cause for such toe-curling embarrassment I may never get my socks on again. On one hand, royalists are in state of near arousal, discerning in the Stone’s journey some symbolic unity between the nations. Give over. As if a stone is somehow going to switch anyone from Yes to No.
On the other hand, ultra nationalists are polishing their claymores and waiting for William Wallace to rise from the dead to defend this slur on plucky Caledonia. Alex Salmond, who leads the vanity project known as the Alba Party, has already said the Scottish government shouldn’t allow the stone to go to England. Which is a great plan if you want Scotland to look like a petty, crabbit wee nyaff of a nation.
Read More: Stone of Destiny leaves Edinburgh Castle and heads to London
One Alba member was howling on social media, claiming the Return of the Stone of Destiny (which sounds like a bad Marvel movie, to be honest) somehow represented England’s “overlordship of Scotland”. I mean, okay, if that’s how you see it. But as far as I know, King Edward hasn’t marched over the border, on his big long shanks, and lain waste to Peebles.
To give a single damn about this affair is an affront to reason. If you reckon this chap called Charles somehow has the right to sit on a special throne and ‘rule’ you because he happened to appear from a particular womb, then you really need to check which millennia you’re living in. And if you believe a scabby big brick being taken for a wee road trip to London is a wound to the soul of Scotland, then please, get help - soon.
I get that some weird objects are ‘symbols’ of various nations. But nobody was ‘disrespecting’ the stone. I honestly can’t even believe I wrote that sentence. It got its own velvet cushion to ride around on. Clearly, that’s less than the “100 Guardians of Scotland” Alba’s general secretary Chris McEleny wanted to oversee the stone’s brief London sojourn in case the English “steal” it. Sigh. I guess all one can say, is, ‘you can’t have everything in life, Chris’. And it’s coming back, so chill.
To read the full article sign up to our Unspun newsletter, delivering the best political insight and analysis at 7pm every weekday. You will find Unspun and more of our newsletters here.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel