WITHOUT the finale of Happy Valley ahead, this Sunday was always going to be less dramatic than the last. Not for the want of trying in some quarters, though.
A round of applause to the Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, which published its report on the appointment of Richard Sharp as BBC chairman at 00.01 on Sunday.
Not that the media had to queue for it at midnight, Harry Potter-style. The report was released under embargo in plenty of time for the Sunday shows.
Adding further interest, committee member and SNP MP John Nicolson was punting the report wherever he could. As a former broadcast journalist, Mr Nicolson needs no media training. (Not that his proactive style always works: see the recent stushie when he tweeted parts of a private letter from Sir Lindsay Hoyle, much to Mr Speaker’s dismay.)
Mr Sharp, a major donor to the Conservatives, was named as the UK Government’s preferred candidate for the BBC job in 2021. The Commons committee backed his appointment. They were not aware, however, that he had acted as a go-between for a loan to then Prime Minister Boris Johnson from a distant cousin. This was only revealed by the Sunday Times in January this year.
On Sky News’ Ridge on Sunday, Mr Nicolson said: “The rules quite clearly say if you apply for a public service job like this you’ve got to be completely open about any conflict of interest.”
Ridge read out a response from Mr Sharp’s spokesman saying the BBC chair appreciated that there was information that the committee felt that it should have been made aware of in his pre-appointment hearing. “He regrets this and apologises,” said the statement.
Mr Nicolson said: “That’s a load of old flannel.” He could have apologised to the committee last week when it called him back, said the MP.
“He is apologising now because he sees how brutal the report is and he is fighting for his job.” Mr Nicolson accused him of being “haughty and entitled” during the committee session.
The MP said “scores” of BBC staff were writing to him, concerned about possible political interference.
Ridge asked Mr Nicolson, a former presenter on BBC Newsnight and BBC Breakfast, if he believed the corporation was impartial.
“I think the BBC aims to be impartial. There are always going to be questions over individual presenters or reporters but the BBC prides itself on its impartiality.” When he was a presenter “nobody ever tried to tell me what to do, what to say and what to ask”.
The committee did not call for Mr Sharp to resign, but Mr Nicolson said he did not see how he could carry on.
"John Nicolson with some pretty punchy words," said Ridge later.
Andrew Mitchell, Foreign Office Minister, said decisions on Mr Sharp’s future should wait until the report produced by the Commissioner for Public Appointments.
“We need to be fair to all parties in this, including Richard Sharp,” he told BBC1’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg.
Put to him that it was a decision for the Government, not the BBC, Mr Mitchell said: “The BBC is not a silent part of all of this, the board of the BBC will need to consider what he’s said and reach their own conclusions.”
Former culture minister Lord Vaizey suggested Mr Sharp’s actions were not a “hanging offence”.
The Tory peer told BBC Radio 4’s Broadcasting House: “You can acknowledge it is a blunder without saying it is a hanging offence. The report doesn’t say he should resign.”
He added: “I get slightly irritated by the whole ‘scandal’ element of this and people pretending they have had an attack of the vapours and they need the smelling salts to be passed. What we are really saying is ‘should you know that someone who is appointed to a position like chairman of the BBC has a connection to the Tory party?'
At the time Mr Sharp applied he was working for Rishi Sunak, and he had made donations to the Tory Party, so it was known, said Lord Vaizey.
BBC Scotland’s The Sunday Show made its contribution to the morning’s drama, although more for who it did not have on the programme than who it did.
Most of the show focused on the Scottish Government's Deposit Return Scheme. But the Minister responsible, Scottish Greens co-leader Lorna Slater, declined to appear. As did any other Minister, or anyone from Circularity Scotland, the scheme administrator, or the Government-funded Zero Waste Scotland.
SNP MSP Fergus Ewing, who said the scheme was heading for disaster if nothing was done, said it was “quite extraordinary” that no minister or agency had appeared on the show.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel