Homes for People, Not for Profit: The crisis of rising rents and the rent control Scotland needs | Meg Bishop, National Secretary of Living Rent
Shelter, a warm place to rest, is one of our most basic needs and fundamental human rights.
Nonetheless, our homes have become speculative tools to be bought, sold, or preferably rented for profit. The dreams of private property, alongside the prevalence of inherited wealth, have made the implications of this in Scotland particularly acute.
A house is also access to other human rights, education; a suitable environment; healthcare. It connects you to your community, your block, your street. Homeownership is seen to be a condition for social status and even successful citizenship, whereas renters are often represented as unambitious or simply awaiting the transition to ownership. These transformations have primarily been attributed to the Right-to-Buy and the stock transfer or demolition of council housing. We’re encouraged to buy a place of our own, but keeping a rented roof over our head is challenging enough.
Far from resulting in the ‘ownership society’ first heralded by the Conservatives, homeownership rates have fallen while the number of people renting privately has continued to rise. Indeed, house prices have risen far beyond the average wage, which has declined in real terms in Scotland. Independent income, or inherited wealth, is now necessary to purchase a home or accumulate a deposit. This, in turn, has an inflationary impact on rents as landlords take advantage of the increasing number of tenants unable to save for a mortgage.
The latest Private Sector Rent statistics published by the government presented a damning report. Rents have been entirely divorced from our ability to afford them, rising by as much as 45.9% since 2010. There is not one council region in Scotland where rents have not increased in this period.
In addition, the number of people experiencing homelessness has risen alongside the contradiction of vacant or under-occupied housing that is used as holiday lets or sits to accrue in value.
We have failed to see just how deeply implicated housing is in the creation of poverty. Instead, the myth persists that hard work from tenants and building more homes are the only solutions to the housing crisis.
We’re told that if the conditions of the working classes deteriorate, it is because of personal or cultural reasons. Proposed solutions that challenge the housing system or threaten the pockets of private landlords are frequently met with vitriol. In particular, debates regarding rent control can hardly begin before they are violently opposed.
Typically, this solution is dismissed because of claims that rent controls would impact the quality of rented housing, harm the efficiency of the housing market, and that instead, we should focus on ‘improving supply’. However, activists and researchers are working to unpick these myths and put forward a case for the rent controls Scotland needs.
Whilst building more housing, particularly social housing, is welcome. The fact of the matter is that rents must come down. By campaigning for rent controls that would use a points-based system to incentive repairs, Living Rent are demonstrating that more recent models of rent control can in fact be beneficial to quality, especially when the quality of private rented housing in Scotland is already abysmal.
The union campaigns for rent controls tied to the property, rather than the tenancy agreement, prevent tenants from feeling stuck in a tenancy at the risk of inflated prices between leases. A serious conversation about rent controls is a necessity for the welfare of tenants. The solution is there; it just needs to be adopted.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel