Politics and the state of the economy continue to be a keen subject of debate on our Letters Pages, especially with the Scottish Budget just around the corner and the SNP still seeking a deal to get its proposals passed.
Earlier this week the First Minister urged his opponents to make sure they act in the interests of “the collective good”.
That comment vexed one of our readers, who asks whether the Government is “prioritising political gamesmanship over genuine fiscal responsibility”.
Alastair Majury of Dunblane writes:
"The ongoing debate over the Scottish Government’s Budget highlights the fragile state of governance in Holyrood. As the SNP urges opposition parties to back its budget for 'the collective good', it is worth reflecting on whether this Government is prioritising political gamesmanship over genuine fiscal responsibility.
John Swinney’s warning of 'a lot of disruption' if the Budget is not passed raises legitimate concerns for public services. However, the SNP’s insistence on maintaining independence spending, even as critical services face potential cuts, is troubling. A government truly focused on 'the collective good' would prioritise the NHS, education, and local government over divisive and partisan goals.
Get the Letter of the Day straight to your inbox.
The situation calls to mind the wisdom of Cicero, who said: 'The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt.' While the context may differ, the principle of fiscal responsibility is timeless.
Similarly, Benjamin Disraeli emphasised the importance of sound governance and the public's trust in government accountability. For the SNP to secure such trust, it must craft a Budget that unites Scotland, addresses its pressing challenges, and places public services above political aspirations."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel