This article appears as part of the Unspun: Scottish Politics newsletter.
And so the SNP’s ban on wood-burning stoves in new-build homes has gone up in a puff of smoke, consigned to the bonfire of failed policies which seems to perpetually burn on the outskirts of Holyrood.
Now future Scots will be able to cuddle up in front of a roaring fire, instead of doing star jumps to keep warm when winter’s storms have knocked out the electricity.
‘A victory for commonsense’, the Scottish Conservatives declared. ‘A positive step,’ The Scottish Islands Federation agreed.
It’s a move that really shouldn’t have had to be taken at all.
When the regulations known as the New Build Heat Standard came into effect in April, the backlash over sudden outlawing of wood-burners in all new properties caught ministers by surprise.
Hard-pressed spin-doctors in the Scottish Government’s communications department scrambled to get abreast of the legislation which had come into force, learning on the fly as they tried to work out what all the fuss was about.
The problem was simple. While those in the cosy central belt rarely have to deal with the heat going off when the winds blow strong, for people in rural areas it’s an entirely different story.
Kate Forbes, then simply the MSP for Skye, Lochaber & Badenoch and yet top take her seat at the top table as Deputy First Minister, said she was “seeking urgent clarification” from the Scottish Government.
She tweeted: "I see many replies dismissing legit concerns cos “everybody should have known about this already” & it’s only for new builds. My inbox suggests most in rural Scotland disagree."
This was a problem all of the Scottish Government’s own making. The alliance with the Scottish Green Party spawned a lot of hot air, but it also saw the fast-tracking of moves to decarbonise buildings at lightning pace.
As the Minister for Zero Carbon Buildings, Patrick Harvie led the charge, setting an ambitious target of decarbonising 1 million homes by 2030. By the end of last year, he had admitted that goal was not possible.
But the push to consign logburners to history hung on – to be phased out in favour of 'zero DEH' systems such as heat pumps, solar thermal storage systems or electric storage heaters.
No-one listened to voices in the Highlands and islands who said that none of these were practical solutions in places where staying on the grid can be an aspiration, and never something to be taken for granted.
These were not academic concerns – In 2023, Storm Gerrit caused power outages to around 27,000 homes in the North of Scotland, while a survey from Consumer Scotland found that “87 per cent of consumers in accessible rural parts of Scotland, and 96% of consumers in remote rural areas, experienced a power cut in the past two years, compared to 67% of respondents in Scotland and 64% of respondents in the UK”.
Under the regulations, some new builds were permitted to have wood-burning heating for emergency purposed only, but there was scant information on what might constitute such a crisis.
READ MORE UNSPUN:
- Was John Swinney 'f***ing stupid' to have endorsed Kamala Harris?
- Why Scotland dropped plans for juryless rape trials
- Budgets should not be complicated - it's now time for Scotland to act
- Are the Greens using budget to take ultimate revenge on SNP?
Even then, there was to be no reprieve for small buildings, with burners ruled out entirely in favour of ‘portable’ small alternatives. What these were, or how they could work when there was no power, was not disclosed.
Announcing the end of the ban, Alasdair Allan, acting minister for climate action said that the Scottish Government had “listened” to rural communities.
But it’s never a good look when Ministers have to reverse course. Governments stand and fall by appearing confident and competent, able to convince the public they know what they are doing.
Too many U-turns and people begin to suspect that it’s all smoke and mirrors. Now the ban joins a long list of reversed decisions from Holyrood’s corridors of power.
Juryless rape trials? Sent down. Highly-protected Marine Areas? Sunk without trace. Bottle deposit scheme? Smashed to smithereens.
Even the SNP’s vaunted emissions targets, where the plan was to cut carbon emissions by 75 percent by 2030, have been flipped.
Now the plan is to get to net zero by 2045. We’ll see how that pans out.
It’s sometimes good for governments to change their policies. On one hand, it shows agile thinking and the ability to listen.
But rip up too many plans and the brains behind them begin to appear incompetent. And sometimes there’s no smoke without fire.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel