The recent cold spell followed by wild weather has brought widespread power cuts and had many of us checking our thermostats and smart meters in anticipation of hefty energy bills to come.
Herald business writer Kristy Dorsey was prompted to write a searing column lambasting the UK Government for what she perceives to be a failure to plan and invest in long-term energy security.
Read more: Storm Isha blows away smoke and mirrors of energy failures
Today, however, a reader argues that the Conservatives should be praised for pushing through new nuclear power projects over the last 14 years – and calls for the SNP to do the same.
Jamie Black of Largs writes:
"Kristy Dorsey writes: 'The Conservatives have had 14 years in power to start making good on the UK’s crumbing energy infrastructure and have failed to do so'.
"For the avoidance of doubt, in those 14 years, the Conservative Government, in the face of stiff (and baseless) opposition, has pushed through the Hinkley C Zero Carbon Power station, and had approved Sizewell C.
"This is on top of the countless wind energy projects that have been approved through government energy policy and investment in gas stations to help 'keep the lights on'. Too late, yes, but nonetheless, all will play a critical part of our energy security in years to come.
Subscribe to our daily Letter of the Day newsletter
"Meanwhile in Scotland the SNP refuses point blank to have a grown-up discussion on building on Scotland's excellent track record of running nuclear power stations for more than 50 years, by way of its quasi-ban on new zero carbon nuclear.
"To develop new stations would not only give us a credible, sustainable, completely carbon-free energy mix, but would provide energy security and high-quality, well-paid long-term jobs for generations to come.
"It's time for change and for the SNP to abandon the anti-nuclear sacred cow once and for all. Scots deserve better than blind ideology."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel