The appointment of David Cameron as Rishi Sunak's new Foreign Secretary has caused some consternation on our Letters Pages.
Yesterday, one of our correspondents discussed how his actions had led to Scotland being taken out of the EU against the wishes of the majority of Scottish voters.
Read more: At last there is now hope of a reset with the EU
Today one of our readers points out that Cameron did the correct thing by standing down after that result, and asks if any of our leaders today would take the same honourable action.
Walter Paul of Glasgow writes:
"Ruth Marr again writes that Scotland voted to stay in the EU at the 2016 referendum; of course Scotland as a country voted with an approximate 62% wishing to remain, but as most people know, the referendum was a UK one, hence the UK leaving the European Union with a just-over 3% majority.
"And hence the reason that David Cameron, who had allowed the referendum to happen and who wished the UK to remain, resigned as PM more or less immediately, doing what some people would term the correct action.
Subscribe to receive our letter of the day newsletter straight to your inbox
"We are reminded of the integrity in 2014 of Alex Salmond who likewise resigned as First Minister of Scotland when the independence referendum produced a majority in favour of remaining part of the UK. In my opinion, both politicians quickly and correctly resigned from their positions because of losing an election.
"Would that some other politicians today would take the same honourable action - and of course I refer to politicians in the SNP, in the Tories, in the Labour Party, in the Greens - many of whom we would be delighted to see the back of.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel