For six consecutive elections since 1994, the African National Congress has dominated South African politics and won the majority of the national vote, but as Foreign Editor David Pratt reports, that winning streak could end this week
It’s going on 31 years now since Nelson Mandela visited Glasgow. As a photographer back then working with the anti-apartheid movement, I was tasked with documenting the great man’s visit in October 1993 and therefore had the opportunity
to meet him during his stay in the city.
Like the thousands of others who attended the rally in George Square at which Mandela spoke, I’ll never forget the welcome he was given after being made a Freeman of the City.
Barely a year later, of course, he would go on to lead the African National Congress (ANC) in the 1994 multiracial general election that would elect him as South Africa’s first black president.
Were Mandela alive today, what, I wonder, all these decades after sweeping to power, would he make of the upcoming election in his country in which the ANC is facing the prospect of losing its majority for the first time since the end of apartheid?
In the three intervening decades that South Africa has been a democracy, it’s hard to recall any of the country’s past national elections that have felt quite so uncertain as this coming Wednesday’s ballot when nearly 30 million South Africans will head to the polls.
For six consecutive elections since 1994, the ANC has unequivocally dominated South African politics and won the majority of the national vote. Now, however, there are many South Africans who believe those days are numbered, among them journalist Redi Tlhabi.
“What is at stake now is a reckoning with the fact that the country that we live in now is not the country that we hoped for 30 years ago, and it is a pivotal time to make a decision to break with the past and make bold decisions for change,” Tlhabi recently told Foreign Policy magazine, echoing the views of others in the country desirous of political shift.
That desire for change and the dwindling of support for the ANC has its roots in the persistent poverty and inequality, high unemployment, corruption scandals, erratic power supply, and high crime rates that have bedevilled South Africa now for many years.
Coalition possibility
If recent polls are anything to go by then the ANC is on course to lose its majority for the first time since it came to power, and while it is still expected to be the largest party by a wide margin, should it fall short of a majority, it will have to negotiate a coalition or some form of deal with other parties.
In such a scenario the ANC leader and South Africa’s current president, Cyril Ramaphosa, would likely remain in office, unless he faces an internal challenge if the party is perceived to have performed badly.
If that happens the party could seek to oust him as its leader and nominate someone else for the National Assembly to elect as president.
It was Ramaphosa who, back in the 1980s and early 90s, was seen as the arch negotiator who oversaw a series of near-miraculous agreements to ensure the end of white rule. Back then, he was the architect of that historic settlement that led to that moment in April 1994, when millions of black South Africans queued outside polling stations waiting to cast their first vote. This time next week, however, could well see Ramaphosa facing a very different kind of political deal making.
Whether he stays or goes, the overwhelmingly likely scenario is that he or the next ANC leader will be president after the election.
There would have to be a massive upset for another party to have a chance of winning the presidency outright.
But regardless of whether Ramaphosa or someone else is president, if the ANC loses its majority it will need support from one or more other parties to keep governing.
The main opposition is the centre-right, pro-business Democratic Alliance (DA) – led by John Steenhuisen, who has suggested he would be willing to form a coalition with
the ANC if his party doesn’t secure a majority. The DA secured a little less than 21% of the vote when elections were last held five years ago.
The DA claims the country is in “crisis” under the current government and wants the nation to move towards more privatisation. Yet, the party is known for its largely white leadership and has struggled to appeal to black voters, who make up 80% of South Africa’s population
The party has also pledged to create two million new jobs and “halve the rate of violent crime”. And ahead of this week’s vote, the DA has also formed a multi-party charter of 10 opposition parties in its bid to “finally unseat” the ANC.
The third-largest party in parliament, meanwhile, is the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) – led by controversial former ANC member Julius Malema who has twice been charged with hate speech and for firing a gun at a public rally.
The EFF advocates “radical economic transformation” – the nationalisation of land and banks, and other key parts of the economy.
White-minority rule
The party, which campaigns on an anti-ANC platform, claims the ANC has still not put right the racial imbalances of apartheid when the country was under white-minority rule, and has said it will redistribute land to the less well-off.
“We are not part of the 1994 elite pact. We are a completely new generation, with new demands,” the EFF manifesto begins.
Finally, in opposition to the ANC, there is also the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party, led by former South African president Jacob Zuma – who was ousted in 2018 after facing corruption allegations. He was later jailed for 15 months in 2021 for defying a court order.
Zuma is leading the MK Party and remains the face of their campaign despite the fact he has been banned from running in the election because of his previous criminal conviction.
Zuma has an axe to grind with his former ANC party. He also retains considerable popularity among fellow ethnic Zulus in his home province despite the allegations against him.
Like many of the parties in contention during the election, the MK has used populist rhetoric. In Zuma’s case, he has railed against LGBTQ+ rights – which are protected by law in South Africa – and suggested that the way to deal with teenage pregnancy would be by sending young mothers to continue their education on Robben Island, he former prison where he and Mandela were jailed under apartheid.
With such an array of parties and their leaders against Ramaphosa, and should the ANC fail to get a majority, then South Africa’s proportional voting system would kick in and he would then need to form a coalition from this disparate range of political partners.
Ramaphosa’s options will be determined by how far the ANC’s vote share falls. If it ends up closer to 40% of the vote than 50%, it may need to join forces with the bigger opposition parties. That presents the ANC with a stark choice between pragmatism and populism.
While a series of previous polls have signalled that the ANC will lose its majority for the first time since taking power in 1994, these polls, however, have largely omitted undecided respondents, says Afrobarometer, a well-known pan-African survey group that last week conducted its own telephone poll of 1,800 South Africans.
“We do not know how undecided voters will ‘break’ so we cannot predict the final election outcome,” Afrobarometer said in commentary on the survey, which was commissioned by the Cape Town-based Institute for Justice and Reconciliation. “Many voters can still be swayed in the last week prior to the election.”
Just what exactly might sway such voters remains to be seen, but what is undoubtedly clear is that part of a younger generation of South Africans appear so disenchanted with democracy that only 40% have registered to vote.
One recent poll, by the South African think tank the Human Sciences Research Council, indicated the scale of such disenchantment – with almost 60% of South Africans aged 18 to 24 rejecting the idea that democracy was always the best system of governance.
Ditch elections
Meanwhile, nearly three-quarters of all South Africans also say they would ditch elections for a government that could provide security, jobs and houses.
“The idea that democracy is benefiting a small group of the elite has really entrenched itself in our society,” said Tessa Dooms, director at the Johannesburg-based think tank Rivonia Circle. “Young people have been made to feel they have no stake in politics,” she added, speaking to the Financial Times.
Nicknamed the “born-free” generation, those under 35 – roughly one-third of the electorate – have lived their entire lives under an ANC government increasingly engulfed by corruption scandals.
While the ANC initially oversaw a rise in living standards and South Africans have on average become richer during the ANC’s three decades in power, incomes have been on a downward trend since 2011.
Crime is also a huge problem, with one person murdered in South Africa every 20 minutes in the last three months of 2023. In the same period, more than 130 people were raped every day. From crime to the economy, the country faces problems on so many levels and this is focusing the minds of voters.
Recent data from the World Bank suggest that the effectiveness of South Africa’s government has plummeted since 1996 with corruption and patronage having eroded the state. Twenty years of economic stagnation means that half of South Africa’s young people are unemployed, the vast majority of them black. This entrenched joblessness is the main reason South Africa is so unequal, say analysts.
Against this depressing backdrop, the ANC is ramping up efforts to sway voters in the final run-up to the elections. Despite its shortcomings, no party comes close to rivalling it when it comes to political heft. That said, some analysts are of the view that like many “liberation parties” across Africa, the ANC is being kept in office by older, rural voters and those who lived through the privations of apartheid.
In other words, it’s not that the ANC’s recent track record is good, but rather that opposition to it has been so poor, say analysts like Ebrahim Fakir, an expert in South African politics.
“The ANC’s greatest gift is this gift of a weak opposition … the opposition is fragmented, disparate, unco-ordinated,” Fakir was recently cited by the US-based Foreign Policy magazine as saying. It’s a view shared by other experts.
Apartheid ended
AS the main liberation movement that fought and helped end apartheid, the ANC has used this fragmentation to its advantage, seeking to downplay the role and relevance of any opposition.
Emeritus professor at the University of the Witwatersrand, Susan Booysen, says “the greatest irony” of the South African elections was that the decline in the ANC’s support was not leading to a massive increase in support for the top opposition parties.
“This is one of the riddles of South African politics,” Booysen told broadcaster Aljazeera.
“There is a lot of splintering happening. This explains a bit of it. At the same time, much of the discontent with the ANC still goes back to voting for the ANC because there are no sufficient alternative parties, and the ANC has delegitimised the opposition as a viable alternative.”
With 70 political parties and 11 independent candidates contesting Wednesday’s national and provincial elections, it’s precisely this disparate opposition that could prove a political godsend for the ANC.
Given that South Africa’s electoral commission normally starts releasing partial results within hours of the polling stations closing and by law has seven days in which to announce full results, the ANC’s fortunes will be known soon enough.
Should their election winning streak finally come to an end, it will mark a key moment for the ANC’s “old guard” and the reshaping of South Africa’s political landscape.
A landscape so very different from those days of hope back in 1994 when Nelson Mandela became the first black president of the “rainbow nation”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here