This article appears as part of the Unspun: Scottish Politics newsletter.
Humza Yousaf better have an anthology of Robert Frost poems, as he really needs to read ‘The Road Not Taken’.
It might prepare him for what looks like an inevitable Labour landslide that will crush the Tories, most probably for a decade at least, and put the entire nationalist project in a ditch.
The poem begins: ‘Two roads diverged in a yellow wood’. And Scotland’s yellow party is certainly in the woods right now. Labour’s astonishing success at the Mid-Bedfordshire and Tamworth by-elections leaves the SNP pretty must lost in a deep, dark forest.
While nothing is certain, a hefty Labour majority beckons. That leaves two roads open for the SNP.
Clearly, independence is over for the foreseeable future. The SNP won’t get indyref2 from Keir Starmer. Even fools see that. Why would any new Prime Minister risk a vote that might break up Britain?
So the SNP can try to keep walking down this road, insisting that indy-is-coming, that voting for the SNP is a vote for independence, but that only ensures defeat when Scotland goes to the polls.
To survive, the SNP must wake up. British politics right now – and Britain includes Scotland – is about two issues: getting the Tories out, and fixing the mess they’ve made. That means voters want to hear about the economy, the cost of living, the NHS, schools, policing and public services.
They don’t want to hear about fantasy-tomorrows which will never come.
The SNP’s tragedy is that it won’t stop with the phoney indy-is-coming game. Even today – even after Rutherglen – its deluded base persists in claiming ‘nobody will vote for Red Tories’. They’ll still be singing that song when the electoral tide rolls over them like King Canute and washes them away.
Read more:
Unspun | Neil Mackay: Get the popcorn, the SNP have gone quite mad
But remember, in the Frost poem, there are two roads that diverge in a yellow wood. If the SNP wakes up and takes the other road – the road that doesn’t put independence first and always – there might be some hope for them.
The SNP’s best bet is to try to retain power at the next Holyrood election. To do that, they must make a decent fist of the Westminster election first. To achieve that, the party will have to perform one almighty u-turn, shoving independence onto the back-burner and putting voter concerns front and centre.
It’s hard to see how they pull that off. Would anyone buy it? The SNP is so boxed in by its indy rhetoric that the entire playing field, when it comes to fixing the Tory mess, has been gifted to Labour.
Yes, Scotland is different, yes there are indy die-hards who will always vote SNP. But are there enough? The cost of living crisis has decoupled a lot – certainly not all, but a lot – of independence support from the SNP.
If Yousaf cannot win back the growing numbers of voters who leant the SNP their support, but now want to see Labour take out the Tories, then the Westminster election might end his premiership.
If Yousaf keeps the SNP’s head above water at the UK general election, he could survive and lead his party into the next Scottish election. But if he does, what then?
Read Neil in Unspun every Friday by clicking here.
The SNP won’t be able to claim indy-is-coming anymore, as we’ll all know that’s just a dumb lie. The SNP will become a party incapable of achieving its principle purpose. Hollowed out. Pointless.
Both roads, then, seem to lead deeper into dark woods, just to varying degrees.
Frost’s poem ends with the narrator saying that “ages hence”, he’ll tell readers which road he chose, “with a sigh”. Yousaf should listen to the lament.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel