Rishi Sunak has insisted the Conservatives could still win the next general election, despite a grim night for his party in three by-elections.
The Prime Minister was in Uxbridge and South Ruislip, the only constituency the Tories managed to hold on to, though with a much-reduced majority.
In Selby and Ainsty, Labour overturned a 20,000-vote majority, while the Lib Dems took Somerton and Frome, winning with a majority of 11,008.
READ MORE: Byelection results: Thumping defeats for Sunak’s Tories in two seats
Mr Sunak and the victorious Tory candidate Steve Tuckwell arrived at the Rumbling Tum cafe early on Friday morning.
“Are you all pumped?” the Prime Minister asked one group of Tory campaigners.
“Normally when I get woken up at three in the morning it’s only bad news. So, it was a welcome change," he joked.
Mr Tuckwell won with a majority of just 495, down from the 7,210 Boris Johnson won in 2019.
The new MP put his victory down to Labour Mayor of London Sadiq Khan's planned extension of the Ultra Low Emission Zone (Ulez) scheme to the capital’s suburbs
Speaking to press, Mr Sunak said: “Westminster’s been acting like the next election is a done deal. The Labour Party has been acting like it’s a done deal. The people of Uxbridge just told all of them that it’s not.
“No one expected us to win here. But Steve’s victory demonstrates that when confronted with the actual reality of the Labour Party, when there’s an actual choice on a matter of substance at stake, people vote Conservative.”
“By-elections, midterms for an incumbent government, are always difficult. They rarely win them.
“The message I take away is that we’ve got to double down, stick to our plan and deliver for people. That’s what I heard when I was out on the doorsteps and that’s what we’re going to do.
“We’re going to work incredibly hard to deliver on our five priorities and earn people’s trust for the next election.”
Mr Sunak conceded the circumstances of the by-elections were “far from favourable”.
“It’s a reminder to politicians that we need to focus on what matters to people and not be distracted by what’s going on in Westminster.”
“We’re getting on and delivering for people and that’s what I’m going to do all the way to the next election,” he added.
Labour's deputy leader, Angela Rayner accepted that Ulez had cost them victory in Mr Johnson’s former seat.
She told BBC Breakfast: “I think one of the things we have to reflect on today is not only the mood against the Tories, but also the decision in Uxbridge was related to Ulez.
“The Uxbridge result shows that when you don’t listen to the voters, you don’t win elections.”
However, the London mayor was standing by the scheme.
A source close to Mr Khan said: “Winning Uxbridge and South Ruislip was always going to be a struggle for Labour.
“Sadiq has always been clear that expanding the Ulez was a really difficult decision, but necessary to save the lives of young and vulnerable Londoners.”
READ MORE: Anger as Liz Truss and cronies bag taxpayer-funded goodbye payments
Earlier in the day, Greg Hands, the Conservative chair, said the party's defeat in the two other by-elections was “driven largely by Conservative voters – previous Conservative voters – staying home”.
“We’re obviously going to listen to people, we’re going to look at some of the reasons why,” he said. “But equally by-elections are not always a good predictor of general elections.
However, the polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice, speaking on the same programme, said Hands was being unrealistic, and that the results showed the Conservatives were “in as deep an electoral hole as polling suggests”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel