Banks could lose their licences if they close customers’ accounts over their political views, it has been reported.
According to The Times, ministers are considering making new laws that stop banks turning customers away in an effort to protect free speech.
The Treasury will also reportedly announce plans as soon as next week to extend the notice time given to customers to close their accounts from one month to three months.Banks will also have to give an explanation of why the accounts are being closed and customers will be able to appeal the decision.
It comes after Nigel Farage’s bank accounts were closed by Coutts because his views “did not align with” the bank’s values.
Mr Farage told the Daily Telegraph members of his family and associates had been designated as politically exposed persons (PEPs) by the bank.
He said someone close to him had their account closed and others had trouble with using the banks facilities.
READ MORE: Nigel Farage -'My bank accounts are closed and I'm a non-person'
“We have had several refusals to open accounts and a very nasty closure a couple of weeks ago,” he said.
Meanwhile, senior conservative MPs have put pressure on Coutts and its owner NatWest after the closure of Mr Farage’s accounts.
In the House of Lords on Wednesday, Treasury minister Baroness Penn said: “I think the point that we can all agree on is that the right to lawful freedom of speech is fundamental.
“And where that has seemed to be brought into question through the provision of services, we have cause to worry.”
Mr Sunak’s press secretary, fielding questions from reporters after PMQs, said it would be “incredibly concerning and wrong” if Mr Farage’s account was closed due to his political opinions.
“No-one should be barred from bank services for their political views,” she said.
Foreign Secretary James Cleverly said the decision “completely undermines the trust we have in our banking and financial systems”.
Former Brexit secretary David Davis said it amounted to “thinly veiled political discrimination” and called it a “vindictive, irresponsible and undemocratic action”.
Energy Security Secretary Grant Shapps said the financial institution’s decision was “absolutely disgraceful” while Home Secretary Suella Braverman called the situation a “scandal”.
She tweeted: “NatWest and other corporates who have naively adopted this politically biased dogma need a major rethink.”
City minister Andrew Griffith spoke of “serious concern”, saying banks are duty bound by their licence to allow someone they disagree with to be a customer.
The Financial Conduct Authority said it would discuss the situation with NatWest.
Speaking to the PA news agency, Mr Farage said his experience has left him fearing the UK is moving towards a “Chinese-style social credit system” where only those with “acceptable views” can participate in society.
“I am effectively de-banked. How do I pay my gas bill? What have I done wrong? I haven’t broken the law,” he said.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak adds to pressure on Coutts bank in Nigel Farage row
Mr Farage, who is also the former leader of the UK Independence Party (Ukip), says he made a subject access request to obtain documents from Coutts’ reputational risk committee that lay out the justification used to close his account.
He handed over 40 pages of documents to the MailOnline, which reportedly raised concerns over a perception that Mr Farage is “xenophobic and racist”.
The bank’s dossier is said to cite comments about Brexit, his retweeting a Ricky Gervais joke about trans women and his friendship with unvaccinated tennis player Novak Djokovic.
It also took issue with his defence of former US president Donald Trump’s behaviour and Mr Farage’s comments criticising the UK Government’s policy of achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel