A report into Scotland’s Deposit Return Scheme has found that it was riddled with problems and mired in uncertainty before Westminster effectively halted it.
The Government’s own “Gateway Review” into the Deposit Return Scheme (DRS), released on Wednesday night, found that officials were reporting widespread uncertainty over how it would work.
It gave the project an “AMBER/RED” status, meaning successful delivery was “in doubt with major risks or issues apparent in a number of key areas”, with “urgent action needed to ensure these are addressed, and establish whether resolution is feasible”.
The scheme was eventually postponed after the Uk Government insisted it exclude glass, something which the Scottish Government said undermined the whole exercise.
In the light of this, was the Scottish Government right to scrap the scheme when it did? Or should Ministers have pushed forward with a glass-less scheme?
Have your say with a Vote in our exclusive Herald Poll:
The Herald has been closely following the debate around the DRS scheme as it has unfolded over the previous months. Read our latest coverage here:
Official report warned DRS recycling scheme was riddled with problems
Calling the UK Government's bluff on glass has spectacularly failed
Scotland's deposit charge could change if UK 'impose' DRS on nations
Our cartoonist Steven Camley’s take on DRS
The SNP-Green Government promoted the DRS as a way to reduce littering and improve recycling of single-use plastic and glass drink bottles and cans.
Consumers would have paid a 20p refundable deposit on each container, then redeemed it when it was returned to a store or recycling machine.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel