THE Labour leader of one of Scotland’s largest councils has been suspended for two months after leaking confidential material for “political gain” while in opposition.
Joe Fagan, who became boss of South Lanarkshire Council last May, received the sanction after a Standards Commission for Scotland hearing in Hamilton.
The SNP called on him to stand down and linked his fate to the likely Rutherglen & Hamilton West byelection, where the SNP is facing a tough Labour challenge.
The Commission said it had considered a longer punishment, but took account of mitigating factors, including Mr Fagan’s more recent conduct.
He was found to have breached the Councillor’s Code of Conduct by leaking a list of leisure and culture facilities identified for closure under the previous SNP administration.
He included the confidential material in a press release on 30 April 2021, a few days before the Scottish Parliament elections.
Cllr Fagan said he regretted what had happened but said his conscience was clear as he had been acting in good faith.
The suspension is expected to start within days, once the council receives the formal judgment in writing.
Labour currently runs South Lanarkshire Council as a minority administration with the support of Independents and Liberal Democrats.
READ MORE: Indy minister - SNP would claim mandate below 'settled will' threshold
Although Cllr Fagan could in theory appeal the decision, this is thought unlikely given the agreed evidence and his cooperation with the process.
Suzanne Vestri, a Standards Commission member and Chair of the Hearing Panel, said failure to respect confidential documents can “damage the reputation and integrity of a council, and can also impede discussions and decision-making.”
The panel agreed it was legitimate for the council to have decided the information should stay confidential until decisions were finalised and communicated properly.
Having reviewed all the available evidence, the Panel was satisfied “that it was clear that the information was confidential at the time Cllr Fagan disclosed it to the press”.
Although there was evidence that Cllr Fagan “disagreed strongly” with the closure plans, the Panel also believed the leak was motivated “at least in part, for political gain” given the backdrop of the Holyrood election.
At the time, the SNP Government's funding of local services was an issue.
The Panel noted, in mitigation, that Cllr Fagan had cooperated fully with the investigation and hearing “and further noted his contribution to public life and to his community”.
READ MORE: Court date set for challenge to UK veto over gender reform bill
There was no evidence of other leaking, dishonesty or concealment, or of any previous contraventions of the Code Of Conduct by Cllr Fagan.
Nevertheless, the Panel found that he “had deliberately disclosed the information and that he had done so, at least in part, for political gain”.
This could have had an impact on council officials and could have caused “undue and unnecessary concern” about possible closures before final decisions were made.
Depute council leader Gerry Convery, who is set to be taking over duting the suspension, was previously censured by the Standards Commission on two occasions.
South Lanarkshire councillor Katy Loudon, the SNP's candidate for the potential Rutherglen & Hamilton West by election, said: "Joe Fagan and his Labour party have always cared more about their own gain than the people they have been elected to serve, and the Commission's findings make that crystal clear.
"Mr Fagan should do the right thing now and resign, after letting down people across South Lanarkshire and his council colleagues.
"If he is not willing to resign – then Anas Sarwar should show leadership and sack him.
"With a potential by-election in Rutherglen & Hamilton West on the cards, people across the constituency will have a chance to reject this type of grubby politics."
In a statement, Cllr Fagan, who represents the East Kilbride Central North, said: “I regret what has happened but my conscience is clear.
"I did what I believed to be right and that’s why I got into local government in the first place. My accusers said I leaked information and yet I openly disclosed it in good faith.
“I believe the Standards framework in Scotland should go after real wrongdoing in local government, it should not tie the hands of those working to expose it.”
A spokesperson for South Lanarkshire Council said: “We note theroutcome of the hearing of the Panel of the Standards Commission for Scotland and we await the written judgment, which we expect to receive within 14 days.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel