RISHI Sunak has been branded as untrustworthy as Boris Johnson and “just dripping with vanity” after a lengthy and often tetchy TV interview.
The Prime Minister was accused of being a “mendacious, narcissistic sociopath” after doing a 20-minute interview with the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg.
After the piece was aired today, author and comedian Ben Elton, who was a panellist on the show, said Mr Sunak was no better than Mr Johnson.
During the interview, Mr Sunak, a privately educated multi-millionaire, had told people to “hold their nerve” over surging mortgage payments.
He also gave his “total support” to the Bank of England, which last week raised interest for the 13th time in a row since December 2021 to 5%, the highest level in 15 years.
Mr Sunak said there was “no alternative” to the Bank’s goal of driving down inflation.
Mr Sunak also defended his recent decision not to vote in the Commons on the Privileges Committee report which found Mr Johnson had repeatedly lied to the parliament.
He said that he had shown moral leadership when he quit as Chancellor over Mr Johnson’s conduct, although that was almost a year ago.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak: mortgage holders must 'hold their nerve' as rates surge
Mr Elton, a Labour supporter, said Mr Sunak had delivered an “extraordinary Orwellian, meaningless, evasive word salad”.
He said: “I sort of believed maybe he’s kind of a bit more decent [than Mr Johnson], and it turns out, he’s as much of a mendacious, narcissistic sociopath as his previous boss.
“This man literally, he seemed to be making a principle of the fact that he resigned from a government that he’d served loyally and tried to keep propped up for numerous years.
“He’s trying to boast about having worried about inflation while he was chancellor of the exchequer under Johnson.”
He added: “He seems to act as if being born into Downing Street six months ago was a miracle birth. No - he was a part of a 13-year cycle which has got us to this point.”
Elton went on: “He’s the Prime Minister. He owes us honesty but we got nothing but mendacity, evasion and vanity, just dripping with vanity.”
Mr Sunak also said he was willing to make unpopular decisions on public sector wages, in the clearest sign yet that he might block pay rises recommended by review bodies.
He said he had to make “difficult decisions” to help curb stubbornly high inflation amid fears that it could be made worse by wage increases.
Unions have expressed outrage over reports that ministers are likely to take the rare step of rejecting some recommendations of the independent pay review bodies.
"Turns out [Sunak] is as much of a mendacious narcissistic sociopath as his previous boss"
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) June 25, 2023
Comedian Ben Elton describes #BBCLauraK's interview with PM Rishi Sunak as "an extraordinary, Orwellian, meaningless, evasive word salad"https://t.co/O6NHH5m1nw pic.twitter.com/7mNzihAZMl
Mr Sunak said: “When it comes to public sector pay I’m going to do what I think is affordable, what I think is responsible.
“Now that may not always be popular in the short term, but it’s the right thing for the country.”
Chief Secretary to the Treasury John Glen also conspicuously refused to say if the Government would accept the independent pay body recommendations.
Whereas ministers had previously said they would accept the recommendations almost automatically, Mr Glen said ministers would now consider “the implications for inflation”.
He told Sky News said: “As a matter of principle pay review bodies are a very significant part of resolving the pay issues. But obviously we’ve also got to take account of the effect on inflation. That would be irresponsible not to do that.”
READ MORE: The Sunday Show, Ridge on Sunday, Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg
Although typically accepted, the recommendations are not binding on ministers.
However the Government follows their advice when it suits it.Last year ministers defended below-inflation pay rises by saying they had followed the bodies’ advice.
Rejection of the recommendations could lead to further industrial action.
Union leaders have warned that “playing politics with working people’s incomes would put everyone’s futures at stake” and have profound consequences for future industrial relations.
Labour has signalled it would rule out rejecting the review bodies’ advice.
Shadow communities secretary Lisa Nandy told Sky: “If we were in government right now we would be asking the pay review bodies to give far more weight to the retention and recruitment crisis in the recommendations that we make.
“We’d take their recommendations seriously but we wouldn’t be bound by them.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel