SHAMED MP Margaret Ferrier has urged constituents not to sign Scotland’s first recall petition when it opens tomorrow.
In a statement posted on her website, the rule-breaking former SNP politician said many voters in the seat had told her that they did not want a by-election.
Signing stations across the South Lanarkshire constituency will open for six weeks from Tuesday morning.
If more than 10 per cent of voters add their names to the petition, either in person or by postal vote, Ms Ferrier will automatically lose her seat.
READ MORE: Margaret Ferrier: Scotland's first recall petition to open on June 20
The process was triggered after MPs backed a thirty-day suspension from the Commons for the former commercial sales manager over her pandemic rule breaches and subsequent criminal conviction.
Ms Ferrier was found guilty of culpable and reckless conduct at Glasgow Sheriff Court last August after she admitted travelling on a train in September 2020 despite knowing she had Covid.
The MP also spoke in the Commons and visited a number of locations in her seat, including a mass in St Mungo’s church and a bar in Prestwick while waiting on the results of a Covid test.
After the positive result came through, she lied to colleagues and said she had to go home to visit a sick relative.
She was ordered to carry out 270 hours of community service after pleading guilty to wilfully exposing people “to the risk of infection, illness and death”.
READ MORE: MPs suspend Margaret Ferrier for Covid rule breach
In her statement, Ms Ferrier said her record of work for her constituents spoke for itself.
She said: “As an independent MP, my constituents are my top priority and always have been.
“The most important thing is that they are able to access the right support when they need it and can be confident that their views are represented. My record speaks for itself in this respect.
“I do not have any desire or need to play into party politics, which inevitably distracts from constituency issues and the needs of local residents.
“While parties have already spent months arguing about their candidates for a by-election that has not even been confirmed, they have disregarded the very real issues faced by many in our community.
“That is why so many constituents have expressed to me that they do not want a by-election."
The MP said some voters had told her that the instructions provided by the local authority were "unclear."
"If you wish to see me continue as your MP, then do not sign the petition paper," she added.
The statement continued: “It is ultimately up to the people of Rutherglen and Hamilton West to decide what happens next – not Westminster, not Holyrood, and certainly not any political party HQs.
“I made a mistake – for which I continue to apologise and have faced severe punishment. It has not deterred me from doing right by my constituents and continuing to fight on their behalf. I hope that my constituents will recognise this.”
The MP said this would be her “only statement on the matter.”
READ MORE: Panel's brutal verdict on Ferrier as appeal fails
Both Labour and the SNP are confident that the 8,113 signatures necessary to force a by-election can be gathered.
According to the most recent figures, there are 15,060 postal voters in Rutherglen and Hamilton West.
If the petition is successful Ms Ferrier can stand in the resulting by-election.
As well as being the first recall petition in Scotland, it will also be the first electoral contest requiring Voter ID.
If she loses her seat, the timing of the by-election will be up to the SNP, who have the responsibility to move the writ in the Commons.
They must put a motion to MPs, and if agreed, the Speaker will notify the relevant Returning Officer.
There is no statutory time limit for the moving of the writ.
However, because the petition ends in the middle of summer, the earliest they can move the writ is when the Commons returns in September.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel