A group of education experts has warned SNP ministers against scrapping exams for S4 pupils amid concern it would have “a seriously negative impact on work rate and motivation”.
The Commission on School Reform, an independent group of education experts set up by the think tank Reform Scotland, has released a new ‘challenge paper’ on assessment and qualification in Scotland’s schools.
A report into exams and assessments in Scotland by Professor Louise Hayward is due to be published soon and is expected to suggest scrapping exams in S4.
Read more: SQA under pressure for refusing to reveal reason for failed appeals
The commission’s paper, written by the former president of School Leaders Scotland, Carole Ford, a former head teacher of Kilmarnock Academy, warns that assessment at the end of S4 serves a different purpose to assessment in S5/S6.
The document provides analysis on progress so far, clarifies strengths and weaknesses, and offers a useful guide to fruitful routes to progress.
Instead of scrapping the exam diet for S4 pupils, the paper outlines a series of recommendations which it claims can be implemented now, maintaining the importance of assessment in S4 while also allowing additional learning time in S5.
The group’s recommendations include separating the S4 assessment system from that of S5 and S6, shortening the S4 assessment timetable and lengthening by one term the Higher assessment timetable and using external assessment data to moderate internal grades.
Read more: Jenny Gilruth: Education system overhaul 'will not cause disruption'
Ms Ford said: “Assessment in S4 improves motivation and work rate throughout S3/S4.
“The removal of external assessment at the end of the National 4 courses has had a seriously negative impact on work rate and motivation, as many teachers will attest.
“On the other hand, assessment in S5/S6 leads to endpoint qualifications which offer entry to higher education, training or employment opportunities. There is no logical reason to tie these two assessment processes together.
“There are undoubtedly many problems in our exams system and Scottish pupils cannot continue to be subjected to a narrow, formulaic assessment system.
“A system which also fails to motivate a significant minority of pupils, exacerbating the serious behavioural issues in our schools.
Read more: Call to review exam appeals over fears of wide 'disparities'
“The Commission on School Reform’s paper highlights opportunities to reform the exam system now, immediately alleviating some of the most serious concerns.
“We can and should take action now on the processes that we, as teachers, know are causing problems. If we fail to do so, we fail yet more of Scotland’s children.”
SNP Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth has suggested “radical” change is needed to modernise Scotland’s qualifications system.
Ms Gilruth told the BBC there was a need to "future-proof our qualifications" adding that the exam programme they may look "radically different" in the future.
The Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA), which runs exams, is set to be broken up after a report warned there was too much focus on exams in schools.
A new body is to be established alongside a replacement for Education Scotland, while a separate school inspection agency will also be formed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel