DURING the SNP leadership campaign Humza Yousaf told audiences at debates up and down the country that if he became First Minister he would certainly be "his own man".
The MSP for Glasgow Pollok was of course keen to convey this message because of the suspicion that he wouldn't in fact be "his own man" due to being the "continuity candidate" to Nicola Sturgeon.
With the former first minister's close ally Shona Robison running his campaign, her closest advisor Liz Lloyd playing a role, and a series of endorsements from Ms Sturgeon's cabinet – including ultimately one from the deputy first minister John Swinney, it was clear Mr Yousaf was the party establishment's choice.
It was a shock for Mr Yousaf's supporters that the politician explicitly calling for change, Kate Forbes, whose message during the race was that "continuity wouldn't cut it" ultimately ran Mr Yousaf very close in the contest, with the result 48 per cent to 52 per cent in the second round of voting.
📝 Sign up for our Unspun newsletter and enjoy exclusive opinion and analysis from some of Scotland's best political writers and commentators. Click here to sign up 👈
Some SNP politicians still believe that if it wasn't for Ms Forbes' speaking too frankly in interviews about her opposition to same-sex marriage and having children outside marriage, getting her campaign off to a disastrous start, she would have won the contest.
It is against the background of support given by Ms Sturgeon's allies to Mr Yousaf when he went for the top job that his decision not to suspend his predecessor from the SNP following her arrest on Sunday is significant.
In normal times, being Ms Sturgeon's continuity candidate wouldn't have been a problem for Mr Yousaf. He could have openly sought her advice, spoken proudly of her record if he wished, while seeking to make his own mark on the Scottish Government.
But with Operation Branchform ongoing, Mr Yousaf is not in a business-as-usual situation.
To many onlookers it simply looks rather odd to be heaping lavish praise, as Yousaf did today, on someone who has just spent seven hours in police custody being questioned by detectives or think it is appropriate for his MSPs to send her flowers, as the SNP Holyrood group agreed this afternoon.
Ms Sturgeon was of course released without charge pending further inquiries and in a statement afterwards said she was "innocent of any wrongdoing".
But by not suspending her from the party or even asking her to stand down voluntarily, the First Minister gives an impression of looking somewhat beholden to her and of being compromised by his close relationship to his predecessor, especially as in previous cases parliamentarians have resigned the party whip without ever being arrested.
This was the case with Michelle Thomson, the former SNP MP now a party MSP. In 2015, when Ms Sturgeon was party leader, Ms Thomson was suspended when it emerged police were investigating allegations of fraud connected to her property portfolio, even though she was never arrested or charged.
Fundamentally Mr Yousaf is now giving the appearance of very much not being "his own man" and of being unable to act independently.
It is a criticism being seized on by the Conservatives and Labour.
But it is also a view expressed privately among some in the SNP even well before Ms Sturgeon's arrest.
Now the talk around Holyrood is that had Mr Yousaf suspended Ms Sturgeon it would have caused a mighty rumpus among her supporters but that the row would have calmed down and there would be recognition the First Minister had taken action which his predecessor would have done in similar circumstances.
Mr Yousaf, on the other hand, is saying that he is being consistent in how he is acting vis a vis Ms Sturgeon as he didn't suspend Colin Beattie, the SNP MSP for Midlothian North and Musselburgh, and the former party treasurer, when he was arrested in April in connection with the same police investigation.
It's a point that has raised eyebrows.
Following the arrest of Ms Sturgeon’s husband Peter Murrell and Mr Beattie it was widely believed that the former FM would be next. Like Ms Sturgeon, both Mr Murrell and Mr Beattie were released by the police without charge pending further inquiries.
Some suspect that the reason why Mr Beattie wasn't suspended is that it would have set a precedent for the same action being applied against Ms Sturgeon when the time came for her arrest.
"If you look what happened in the past, Nicola would pull the person and ask questions later," one senior source told me.
"Sometimes people went on to be charged while at other times people were suspended and the matter never came to anything.
"Imagine a world where Nicola was still first minister, Peter wasn't the chief executive and there was a treasurer who was an MSP and they found a campervan on his premises. Do you seriously think...
...want to read the full article? Sign up for free to the Unspun newsletter and receive it directly to your inbox every weekday night at 7pm. Click here 👈
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article