THE Scottish Government will need to cut spending and raise taxes to meet its legally binding child poverty targets, a watchdog has warned.
The Poverty and Inequality Commission, which provides independent advice to ministers, said the recent increase in the Scottish Child Payment to £25 per week and its roll out to eligible under-16s during 2022-23 had made “a real difference to the lives of children and families across Scotland”, but that it would not be enough.
The Child Poverty (Scotland) Act 2017 requires Scottish ministers to ensure that less than 18 per cent of children are living in poverty by 2023/24 and less than 10 per cent of children are living in poverty by 2030.
The latest official statistics, covering 2021/22, show that 24%, around 250,000 children, are living in poverty in Scotland.
READ MORE: Transport is made a ScotGov cabinet position in wake of ferry crisis
Bill Scott, chair of the Poverty and Inequality Commission, said: “The Scottish Government must commit to funding the actions required to meet the child poverty targets and it will need to reprioritise spend and use its devolved tax powers to raise additional revenue.
“The current financial situation is challenging and the funding being allocated to tackle child poverty does not seem to match the ambitions the Scottish Government set out in [poverty strategy] Best Start, Bright Futures.
“This is likely to be one reason for the lack of pace of delivery. A planned increase to employability funding was delayed, and limited funding has been allocated so far to deliver childcare commitments.”
“Our message could not be clearer. We need to see greater investment being made to key areas which can have the greatest impact and we need to see that happen now, before it’s too late to meet the targets,” he added.
READ MORE: NHS strike: Scotland junior doctors reject pay offer
According to a new Scottish Government report an estimated £3.03 billion was invested across a range of programmes targeted at low-income households in 2022-23.
They said this resulted in poverty levels being nine percentage points lower than they would have been had SNP-Green plans not been in place.
In a statement to Holyrood, Shirley-Anne Somerville, the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice, said the government was “committed to driving forward action at the pace and scale required to ensure our statutory child poverty targets are met.”
She said modelling of Scottish Goverment policies showed that “around 90,000 fewer children are expected to live in relative or absolute poverty this year, with levels of relative and absolute poverty 9% points lower than would otherwise have been the case.”
The minister added: “This includes lifting an estimated 50,000 children out of poverty through the investment in our Scottish Child Payment.
“This considerable impact reinforces the importance of our actions to reduce child poverty. It also shows what we can do to tackle child poverty head on within our limited powers and fixed budget and that we can make a difference.”
Ms Somerville said she was acting with one hand tied behind her back. “It is only with the full powers of an independent nation that governments can use all levers such as economic, social security and employment to tackle poverty and inequalities,” she added.
The minister said the “challenging circumstances of the past year” meant it had not been possible to “deliver the levels of investment in key measures anticipated when Best Start, Bright Futures was published.”
She said the government was “determined to do more to tackle and reduce child poverty.”
READ MORE: NHS strike: Scotland junior doctors reject pay offer
Responding to the report, John Dickie, the Director of the Child Poverty Action Group,said there was “very real and substantial progress on child poverty” but that progress was “not yet enough to meet statutory child poverty targets.” ]
He also called for the First Minister to stand by his promise during the SNP leadership campaign to increase the Scottish child payment to £30 in his first budget.
“Looking ahead independent analysis suggests an increase to at least £40 in this parliament will be needed to help meet child poverty targets,” he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel