Humza Yousaf has confirmed SNP and Greens ministers “don’t believe there’s a case” for compensation to be given to businesses who make investments amid the delayed deposit return scheme (DRS).
Humza Yousaf said the UK Government sought to “sabotage” the scheme at the 11th hour through its objection to glass bottles being included.
On Wednesday, the DRS was delayed for a fourth time until at least October 2025 to align it with a planned scheme in England.
The Scottish Government blamed Westminster for the delay, saying the lack of an exclusion for glass under the UK-wide Internal Market Act undermined the scheme.
But the Herald on Sunday has revealed that current SNP and Greens ministers raised concerns about the potential clash three years ago as part of a Holyrood committee probing the Internal Market Act.
Read more: SNP raised DRS concerns three years ago despite '11th hour' claim
The Federation of Independent Retailers said it is taking advice on possible legal action, saying it has been left out of pocket by the need to prepare for the DRS.
The First Minister was asked about requests for compensation when he spoke to the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg show.
He said: “We don’t believe there’s a case for the Scottish Government to need to compensate because the action we’ve had to take is because of that 11th hour, last-minute intervention from the UK Government, which has meant that a Scottish scheme, unfortunately, isn’t viable.”
Mr Yousaf said the DRS is an example of how “devolution is becoming unworkable” due to Westminster’s intervention.
Earlier, Circular Economy minister Lorna Slater said industry figures felt aligning with the UK Government’s DRS was the way forward, even if it meant another delay.
Ms Slater accepted businesses have made “significant investment” to prepare for the DRS – but said the sector supported the decision to delay until the UK Government’s scheme is ready.
Read more: Analysis: Calling the UK Government's bluff on glass has spectacularly failed
Speaking on Thursday, she said she was “very, very sceptical” UK ministers will meet the October 2025 deadline for introducing its DRS.
But the Scottish Conservatives said Mr Yousaf is creating a constitutional row to hide his government’s failings.
MSP and party chairman Craig Hoy said: “Businesses across Scotland will be appalled that Humza Yousaf has dismissed out of hand their calls for compensation.
“Claims that the UK Government sabotaged this scheme simply do not wash when ministers were aware for years that they would need to apply for an internal market exemption.
“Businesses which are already struggling with rising costs know who is to blame for the constant delays to the deposit return scheme.
“The fault lies squarely with Lorna Slater and this SNP-Green government who should be footing the bill for the millions of pounds businesses shelled out in good faith to prepare for the scheme going live in Scotland.”
Scottish Labour net zero spokesperson, Sarah Boyack, said: “From the very start, there have been serious concerns raised about the DRS and they have always fallen on deaf ears.
“Businesses have been ignored by the SNP and the Greens, and now they are being expected to foot the bill of this incredibly expensive shambles.
“The chaos and incompetence that has characterised this scheme is becoming second nature for this government.”
She added: “During this entire interview, the independence obsessed Humza Yousaf spent more time promising a referendum than he did talking about the issues with the DRS, our NHS, or the cost of living crisis.”
“The SNP must stop blaming their own failures on devolution and focus on the real issues facing Scots now.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel